Concepts and Categorization. Systematic and Historical Perspectives

Münster: mentis (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The study of concepts lies at the intersection of various disciplines, both analytic and empiric. The rising cognitive sciences, for instance, are interested in concepts insofar as they are used in an explanation of such diverse epistemic phenomena like categorization, inference, memory, learning, and decision-making. In philosophy, the challenge imposed by conceptualization consists, among other things, in accommodating reverse intuitions about concepts like shareability, mind-dependency, mediation between reference, knowledge and reality, etc. While researchers have collaborated more and more to contribute to a unified understanding of concepts and categorization, the joint venture unfortunately suffers (so far) from the fact that it is generally left unclear how exactly the different approaches undertaken in the participating sciences relate to each other. What do psychologists and philosophers mean by the notion of a concept? Is there a core-theory of concepts and categorization underlying analytical and empirical studies? The present collection of essays addresses these and related questions and tries to answer them from both a systematic and a historical perspective.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,319

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An improved reply to the argument from categorization.Dennis Earl - 2007 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 28 (3-4):279-288.
Principles of categorization.Eleanor Rosch - 1988 - In Allan Collins & Edward E. Smith (eds.), Readings in Cognitive Science, a Perspective From Psychology and Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. pp. 312-22.
The essence of essentialism.George E. Newman & Joshua Knobe - 2019 - Mind and Language 34 (5):585-605.
Is a Unified Account of Concepts Possible?James David Byrd - 2003 - Dissertation, University of California, Davis
The Theory-Theory of Moral Concepts.John Jung Park - 2015 - Journal of Cognition and Neuroethics 3 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-27

Downloads
27 (#672,530)

6 months
17 (#242,816)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

David Hommen
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Christoph Kann
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references