Is time dilation physically observable?

Foundations of Physics 4 (1):105-113 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The circular arc swept out by the angular displacement of a clock indicator (or its equivalent representation) measuring time is shown to be a Lorentz invariant, representing “universal” time. The concepts of time dilation and transverse Doppler effect are accordingly not physically observable. The experiments on these effects when examined critically are found to be inconclusive. Length contraction, also experimentally unconfirmed, and kinematic temporal phase, both consequences of the Lorentz transformations, are as a matter of logical consistency also physically unobservable

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,117

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A note on relativity before Einstein.M. N. Macrossan - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (2):232-234.
Particle velocities faster than the speed of light.Gary R. Gruber - 1972 - Foundations of Physics 2 (1):79-82.
What Is a Physically Reasonable Space-Time?John Byron Manchak - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (3):410-420.
Shedding light on time.Craig Callender - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):599.
Space-Time and Isomorphism.Brent Mundy - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992 (Volume One: Contributed Papers):515-527.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
47 (#311,668)

6 months
3 (#643,273)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references