In Stefania Centrone, Deborah Kant & Deniz Sarikaya (eds.), Reflections on the Foundations of Mathematics. Springer Verlag. pp. 3-26 (2019)

Authors
Džamonja Mirna
University of East Anglia
Deborah Kant
Universität Konstanz
Abstract
The status of independent statements is the main problem in the philosophy of set theory. We address this problem by presenting the perspective of a practising set theorist. We thus give an authentic insight in the current state of thinking in set-theoretic practice, which is to a large extent determined by independence results. During several meetings, the second author asked the first author about the development of forcing, the use of new axioms and set-theoretic intuition on independence. Parts of these conversations are directly presented in this article. They are supplemented by important mathematical results as well as discussion sections. Finally, we present three hypotheses about set-theoretic practice: First, that most set theorists were surprised by the introduction of the forcing method. Second, that most set theorists think that forcing is a natural part of contemporary set theory. Third, that most set theorists prefer an answer to a problem with the help of a new axiom of lowest possible consistency strength, and that for most set theorists, a difference in consistency strength weighs much more than the difference between Forcing Axiom and Large Cardinal Axiom.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,564
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Comments on Zimmerman.Elisa Paganini - 2005 - Dialectica 59 (4):459-462.
Ethical Issues in the Selection Interview.Clive Fletcher - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (5-6):361-367.
On Fuzzy Sets and the Precisiation of Meaning- An Interview with Prof. Dr. Loffi A. Zadeh.Rudolf Seisling - 2013 - Archives for the Philosophy and History of Soft Computing 2013 (1).
Motivating the Relevant Alternatives Approach.Patrick Rysiew - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (2):259-279.
Motivating the Relevant Alternatives Approach.Patrick Rysiew - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (2):259-279.
Framing a Phenomenological Interview: What, Why and How.Simon Høffding & Kristian Martiny - 2016 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15 (4):539-564.
Interview po čtyřiceti letech.Josef Zumr - 2007 - Filosoficky Casopis 55:359-364.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-11-12

Total views
3 ( #1,366,937 of 2,533,568 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #390,861 of 2,533,568 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes