Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (2):431-452 (2010)
AbstractPrevailing philosophical genealogies of modernity trace its origin to Descartes’s metaphysics of representation. This is true of both Hegel and Heidegger. By contrast, Reiner Schürmann’s Broken Hegemonies links modernity to the theological thinking of MartinLuther. I ask what is at stake philosophically in this difference. What Schürmann’s reading shows is that, under the figure of a passive transcendentalism, Luther inaugurates the epoch in which self-consciousness reigns as an ultimate principle. The broader importanceof Schürmann’s reading is to identify a “recessed” and “obedient” side of modernity—a side tragically and covertly linked to its more familiar self-assertive side. Schürmann’s resituating of modernity allows a crucial corrective to many contemporary efforts at a critiqueof the modern. In particular, it suggests that to restrict one’s critique of modernity to the critique of representational or egological consciousness (as happens for example in Heidegger, Levinas and Marion) is to run the risk of a repetition of its obedient, recessed side
Similar books and articles
The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity and the Modernity Context of Philosophy.Xiangping Shen - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 16:241-247.
Unending modernity.David S. Stern - 1995 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 38 (3):277 – 288.
Melancholy and the Critique of Modernity: Søren Kierkegaard’s Religious Psychology.Harvie Ferguson - 1994 - Routledge.
The Impertinent Self: A Heroic History of Modernity.Josef Früchtl - 2009 - Stanford University Press.
The Impertinent Self: A Heroic History of Modernity and Film.Josef Früchtl - 2009 - Stanford University Press.
Tensions of Modernity: Las Casas and His Legacy in the French Enlightenment.Daniel R. Brunstetter - 2012 - Routledge.
Levinas, Habermas and modernity.Nicholas H. Smith - 2008 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (6):643-664.
Modernity, disenchantment, and the ironic imagination.Michael T. Saler - 2004 - Philosophy and Literature 28 (1):137-149.
Facts, fetishes, and the parliament of things: Is there any space for critique?Srikanth Mallavarapu & Amit Prasad - 2006 - Social Epistemology 20 (2):185 – 199.
Eurocentrism: A Marxian Critical Realist Critique.Nick Hostettler - 2012 - Routledge.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads