Moral action as social capital, moral thought as cultural capital

Journal of Moral Education 39 (1):21-36 (2010)
Abstract
This paper explores the idea that moral thought/reasoning and moral actions are actually two separate phenomena that have little relationship to each other. The idea that moral thinking does or can control moral action creates a difficult dualism between our knowledge about morality and our everyday actions. These differences run parallel to the distinction between social capital and cultural capital—where social capital is based on cooperation and trust and leads to purposeful solutions to real time social problems and cultural capital serves as a shorthand sign that certain individuals should be recognized as accepted members of an ongoing community. Social capital and cultural capital, like moral action and moral thought, are related and sometimes even dependent on each other, but they are different phenomena sometimes working towards different purposes. We suggest that moral action is actually a form and an originating source of social capital and moral thought is an important form of cultural capital in many social groups. The differences between moral action and moral thought can lead to social tensions—including which is more valuable and how each should be approached in terms of education. John Dewey suggested that morality is tied to active engagement in the solving of a community's problems and should be integrated into the everyday activities of the classroom. Those who view morality through more of a cultural capital lens often times see morality as a stable set of social values—an important resource that needs to be transmitted between generations
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/03057240903528592
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,727
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Pragmatism.W. James & F. C. S. Schiller - 1907 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 15 (5):19-19.
Art as Experience.I. E. & John Dewey - 1934 - Journal of Philosophy 31 (10):275.
The Philosopher Replies.J. Dewey - 1939 - In John Dewey, Paul Arthur Schilpp & Lewis Edwin Hahn (eds.), The Philosophy of John Dewey. Open Court. pp. 515--608.
Is Kohlberg a Disciple of Dewey?David R. Carlin - 1981 - Educational Theory 31 (3-4):251-257.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Cultural Capital of the Moralist and the Scientist.Min Ju Kang & Michael Glassman - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):340-341.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2010-09-02

Total downloads
11 ( #415,422 of 2,197,333 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #299,047 of 2,197,333 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature