Permanency planning for children with disabilities: Enforcing the right of all children to live with a family
Under federal law, the state must develop permanency plans for all children who are removed from their homes due to neglect or abuse. Central to permanency planning is the belief that all children belong with families Permanency planning secures for children permanent family placements as opposed to temporary foster care or institutional placements. For children with disabilities who are voluntarily placed in institutions by their parents because their parents can no longer take care of them at home, no such permanency planning is generally required. In this Article, the author argues that two recent policy developments that serve to protect the best interests of children generally should be expanded to address the needs of families who require support to keep their children with disabilities at home rather than placing them in institutions. These two recent policy developments are permanency planning for children who have been neglected and abused and the expansion of the definition of legal parenthood, in the context of surrogacy, same sex families, step-families, and children born to unmarried adults.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Meet the Parents: A Parents' Perspective on Product Placement in Children's Films. [REVIEW]Simon Hudson, David Hudson & John Peloza - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 80 (2):289 - 304.
When Choosing the Traits of Children is Hurtful to Others.Timothy Murphy - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (2):105-108.
Moral Education in Family Life: The Effects of Diversity.J. Mark Halstead - 1999 - Journal of Moral Education 28 (3):265-281.
Children and the Argument From 'Marginal' Cases.Amy Mullin - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (3):291-305.
Ethical Issues in Discharge Planning for Vulnerable Infants and Children.Marsha H. Cohen - 1995 - Ethics and Behavior 5 (1):1 – 13.
Acceptance, Avoidance, and Ambiguity: Conflicting Social Values About Childhood Disability.Carol Levine - 2005 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (4):371-383.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #378,405 of 2,171,800 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,702 of 2,171,800 )
How can I increase my downloads?