Journal of Philosophy 96 (5):217-40 (1999)
Consider the following principle: (LP) If an action is undetermined at a time t, then its happening rather than not happening at t would be a matter of chance or luck, and so it could not be a free and responsible action. This principle (which we may call the luck principle, or simply LP) is false, as I shall explain shortly. Yet it seems true.
|Keywords||Chance Epistemology Free Will Indeterminism Luck|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Moral Responsibility and Determinism: The Cognitive Science of Folk Intuitions.Shaun Nichols & Joshua Knobe - 2007 - Noûs 41 (4):663–685.
Explaining Away Incompatibilist Intuitions.Dylan Murray & Eddy Nahmias - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2):434-467.
Farewell to the Luck (and Mind) Argument.Christopher Evan Franklin - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 156 (2):199-230.
Persistent Bias in Expert Judgments About Free Will and Moral Responsibility: A Test of the Expertise Defense.E. Schultz, E. T. Cokely & A. Feltz - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1722-1731.
Similar books and articles
Kane, Luck, and the Significance of Free Will.Alfred R. Mele - 1999 - Philosophical Explorations 2 (2):96-104.
Free Will, Determinism, and Indeterminism.Robert H. Kane - 2002 - In Harald Atmanspacher & Robert C. Bishop (eds.), Between Chance and Choice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Determinism. Thorverton UK: Imprint Academic. pp. 371--406.
Luck and History-Sensitive Compatibilism.Neil Levy - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (235):237-251.
On Free Will, Responsibility and Indeterminism: Responses to Clarke, Haji, and Mele.Robert H. Kane - 1999 - Philosophical Explorations 2 (2):105-121.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads583 ( #2,429 of 2,168,962 )
Recent downloads (6 months)38 ( #7,176 of 2,168,962 )
How can I increase my downloads?