The illusion of realism in film

British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (3):243-258 (2002)
Gregory Currie, arguing against recent psychoanalytic and semiotic film theory, has defended various realist theses about film. The strongest of these is that ‘weak illusionism’—the view that the motion of film images is an illusion—is false. That is, Currie believes film images really do move. In this paper I defend the common-sense position of weak illusionism, firstly by showing that Currie underestimates the power of some arguments for it, especially one based on the mechanics of projection, and secondly by showing that film images exhibit neither garden-variety motion, nor a special response-dependent kind.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjaesthetics/42.3.243
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,871
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Seeing Motion and Apparent Motion.Christoph Hoerl - 2015 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):676-702.
A New/Old Ontology of Film.Rafe McGregor - 2013 - Film-Philosophy 17:265-280.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
93 ( #63,369 of 2,231,939 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #147,681 of 2,231,939 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature