Kantian Review 18 (2):263-288 (2013)

Authors
Edward Kanterian
University of Kent
Abstract
Trendelenburg argued that Kant's arguments in support of transcendental idealism ignored the possibility that space and time are both ideal and real. Recently, Graham Bird has claimed that Trendelenburg (unlike his contemporary Kuno Fischer) misrepresented Kant, confusing two senses of . I defend Trendelenburg's : the ideas of space and time, as a priori and necessary, are ideal, but this does not exclude their validity in the noumenal realm. This undermines transcendental idealism. Bird's attempt to show that the Analytic considers, but rejects, the alternative fails: an epistemological reading makes Kant accept the alternative, while an ontological reading makes him incoherent. As I demonstrate, Trendelenburg acknowledged the ambiguity of , focusing on the transcendental, not the empirical sense. Unlike Fischer, Bird denies Kant's commitment to things-in-themselves in favour of a descriptivist, non-ontological reading of transcendental idealism as an inventory of . But neither Bird's descriptivism, nor Fischer's commitment to things-in-themselves, answers Trendelenburg's sceptical worry about transcendental idealism
Keywords Graham Bird   Kuno Fischer   Immanuel Kant   space   time   transcendental idealism   F. A. Trendelenburg
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s1369415413000022
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,564
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophical investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein & G. E. M. Anscombe - 1953 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 161:124-124.
The Thought: A Logical Inquiry.Gottlob Frege - 1956 - Mind 65 (259):289-311.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

F. A. Trendelenburg and the Neglected Alternative.Andrew Specht - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (3):514-534.
Hegel and Formal Idealism.Manish Oza - forthcoming - Hegel Bulletin:1-25.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reply to Edward Kanterian.Graham Bird - 2013 - Kantian Review 18 (2):289-300.
Kant Vs. Lambert and Trendelenburg on the Ideality of Time.Arthur Melnick - 2001 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 18 (1):79 - 90.
Kant's Response to Skepticism.Robert Stern - 2008 - In John Greco (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford University Press. pp. 265.
Transcendental Idealism in the 'Aesthetic'.Kieran Setiya - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (1):63–88.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-06-10

Total views
121 ( #99,168 of 2,533,484 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #391,480 of 2,533,484 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes