Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (1):1-22 (2011)
Officials must understand why and how the public lost confidence in the federal government’s ability to manage financial turmoil. Officials outsourced to private parties responsibility for monitoring and policing the safety-net exposures that were bound to be generated by weaknesses in the securitization process. When the adverse consequences of this imprudent arrangement first emerged, officials claimed for months that the difficulties that short-funded, highly leveraged firms were facing in rolling over debt reflected only a shortage of aggregate liquidity and not individual-firm shortages of economic capital. Then, in September 2008, the president and other officials created an unwise sense of urgency that delays in implementation show to have been greatly exaggerated.That authorities and financiers violated common-law duties of loyalty, competence, and care they owe to taxpayers indicates a massive incentive breakdown in industry and government. Taxpayers deserve a thorough-going reorientation of: (1) how regulatory agencies report on their regulatory performance and back-room interactions with Congress and the Treasury, and (2) the contract structures and performance measures used by the financial industry and its government overseers
|Keywords||Applied Philosophy Business and Professional Ethics Social Science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Virtue Ethics and Moral Psychology: The Situationism Debate.Candace L. Upton - 2009 - Journal of Ethics 13 (2-3):103-115.
What is Business Ethics? A Reply to Peter Drucker.W. Michael Hoffman & Jennifer Mills Moore - 1982 - Journal of Business Ethics 1 (4):293 - 300.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Financial Interests and Research Bias.David B. Resnik - 2000 - Perspectives on Science 8 (3):255-285.
The Ethics of Worker Safety Nets for Corporate Change.Marianne M. Jennings, Larry R. Smeltzer & Marie F. Zener - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (6):459 - 468.
The Ethics of Credit Rating Agencies: What Happened and the Way Forward. [REVIEW]Steven Scalet & Thomas F. Kelly - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 111 (4):477-490.
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Investigation in the U.K. Supermarket Industry. [REVIEW]Geoff Moore - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 34 (3-4):299 - 315.
Capabilities, Proactive CSR and Financial Performance in SMEs: Empirical Evidence From an Australian Manufacturing Industry Sector. [REVIEW]Nuttaneeya Ann Torugsa, Wayne O'Donohue & Rob Hecker - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 109 (4):483-500.
The Impact of Prior Firm Financial Performance on Subsequent Corporate Reputation.Sue Annis Hammond & John W. Slocum - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (2):159 - 165.
Comparing Big Givers and Small Givers: Financial Correlates of Corporate Philanthropy. [REVIEW]Bruce Seifert, Sara A. Morris & Barbara R. Bartkus - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 45 (3):195 - 211.
The Reciprocal and Non-Linear Relationship of Sustainability and Financial Performance.Marcus Wagner & Joris Blom - 2011 - Business Ethics 20 (4):418-432.
The Link Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance: Evidence From the Banking Industry. [REVIEW]W. Gary Simpson & Theodor Kohers - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 35 (2):97 - 109.
A Study of the Link Between a Corporation's Financial Performance and its Commitment to Ethics.Curtis C. Verschoor - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (13):1509-1516.
The Effects of “Going Private” on Corporate Financial and Corporate Social Performance.Marguerite Schneider & Alix Valenti - 2008 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:236-245.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads12 ( #369,867 of 2,153,830 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,274 of 2,153,830 )
How can I increase my downloads?