Philosophical Studies 135 (1):65 - 71 (2007)
I discuss Gregory Currie’s taxonomy of explanations of the fictional. On the one hand, there is an important kind of relation between internal and external explanations of some fictional truths that Currie leaves out, where both are salient and yet in a relation of harmony with each other. On the other hand, I do not see that he has established that there is a genuine relation of tension between some pairs of internal and external explanations, and thus I question the usefulness of the category of collapse. I also consider a further kind of explanation: the exterior explanation.
|Keywords||Fiction Explanation Narrative|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts.Kendall L. Walton - 1990 - Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Is Factuality a Matter of Content?Gregory Currie - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):763-763.
Can Classical Structures Explain Quantum Phenomena?Alisa Bokulich - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (2):217-235.
How to Be a Nominalist and a Fictional Realist.Ross P. Cameron - 2013 - In Christy Mag Uidhir (ed.), Art and Abstract Objects. Oxford University Press. pp. 179.
The Value of Fictional Worlds (or Why 'the Lord of the Rings' is Worth Reading).James Harold - 2010 - Contemporary Aesthetics 8.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads62 ( #82,480 of 2,154,182 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #397,226 of 2,154,182 )
How can I increase my downloads?