Faith and Philosophy 6 (2):207-214 (1989)
AbstractPhilip E. Devine has presented insightful proposals for defining religion in his essay “On the Definition of Religion” (Faith and Philosophy, July 1986). But despite his illuminating discussion, particularly the treatment of borderline cases, his account fails to distinguish religion as a process or goal-oriented activity from religion as a body of doctrine, and is mistaken (or perhaps unclear) in its proposal that religion per se is committed to the existence of superhuman agents. These deficiencies are exposed herein, and a sketch of an alternative view of religion, inspired by the views of both William James and Josiah Royce, is set forth
Similar books and articles
Defining Chinese Folk Religion: A Methodological Interpretation.Wai Yip Wong - 2011 - Asian Philosophy 21 (2):153 - 170.
The Faith Instinct: How Religion Evolved and Why It Endures.Nicholas Wade - 2009 - Penguin Press.
The Living God: Basal Forms of Personal Religion.Nathan Söderblom - 1933 - American Mathematical Society.
Religion and Hume's Legacy.D. Z. Phillips & Timothy Tessin (eds.) - 1999 - St. Martin's Press, Scholarly and Reference Division.
Phenomenology of Religion: Eight Modern Descriptions of the Essence of Religion.Joseph Dabney Bettis - 1969 - New York: Harper & Row.
The Importance of Religion: Meaning and Action in Our Strange World.Gavin Flood - 2012 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
¿Qué es una ‘religión’? Tres teorías recientes.José Tomás Alvarado Marambio - 2016 - 'Ilu. Revista de Ciencias de Las Religiones 21:31-49.
Evaluating Religion.Tomis Kapitan - 2009 - In Jonathan L. Kvanvig (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion: Volume 2. Oxford University Press.
Spiritual, but Not Religious?: On the Nature of Spirituality and its Relation to Religion.Jeremiah Carey - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 83 (3):261-269.
References found in this work
No references found.