Devine on Defining Religion

Faith and Philosophy 6 (2):207-214 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philip E. Devine has presented insightful proposals for defining religion in his essay “On the Definition of Religion” (Faith and Philosophy, July 1986). But despite his illuminating discussion, particularly the treatment of borderline cases, his account fails to distinguish religion as a process or goal-oriented activity from religion as a body of doctrine, and is mistaken (or perhaps unclear) in its proposal that religion per se is committed to the existence of superhuman agents. These deficiencies are exposed herein, and a sketch of an alternative view of religion, inspired by the views of both William James and Josiah Royce, is set forth

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,509

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
39 (#296,934)

6 months
1 (#417,896)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tomis Kapitan
Indiana University, Bloomington (PhD)

Citations of this work

¿Qué es una ‘religión’? Tres teorías recientes.José Tomás Alvarado Marambio - 2016 - 'Ilu. Revista de Ciencias de Las Religiones 21:31-49.
Evaluating Religion.Tomis Kapitan - 2009 - In Jonathan L. Kvanvig (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion: Volume 2. Oxford University Press.
Spiritual, but Not Religious?: On the Nature of Spirituality and its Relation to Religion.Jeremiah Carey - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 83 (3):261-269.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references