Decision Theory as Philosophy

Cambridge University Press (1996)

Authors
Mark Kaplan
Indiana University, Bloomington
Abstract
Is Bayesian decision theory a panacea for many of the problems in epistemology and the philosophy of science, or is it philosophical snake-oil? For years a debate had been waged amongst specialists regarding the import and legitimacy of this body of theory. Mark Kaplan had written the first accessible and non-technical book to address this controversy. Introducing a new variant on Bayesian decision theory the author offers a compelling case that, while no panacea, decision theory does in fact have the most profound consequences for the way in which philosophers think about inquiry, criticism and rational belief. The new variant on Bayesian theory is presented in such a way that a non-specialist will be able to understand it. The book also offers new solutions to some classic paradoxes. It focuses on the intuitive motivations of the Bayesian approach to epistemology and addresses the philosophical worries to which it has given rise.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 1983, 1996, 1998, 2012
Buy this book $39.99 used (34% off)   $54.05 new (11% off)   $56.64 from Amazon (7% off)   Amazon page
ISBN(s) 9780511804847   9780521624961   0521624967
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,899
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News.David Christensen - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (2):187-217.
Lockeans Maximize Expected Accuracy.Kevin Dorst - 2019 - Mind 128 (509):175-211.
Belief and Credence: Why the Attitude-Type Matters.Elizabeth Jackson - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (9):2477-2496.
Evidence, Pragmatics, and Justification.Jeremy Fantl & Matthew McGrath - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (1):67-94.

View all 57 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Decision Theory as Philosophy.Mark Kaplan - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (4):549-577.
Rational Decisions.Ken Binmore - 2011 - Princeton University Press.
Rational Decisions.Ken Binmore - 2008 - Princeton University Press.
Bayesian Probability.Patrick Maher - 2010 - Synthese 172 (1):119 - 127.
An Introduction to Decision Theory.Martin Peterson - 2009 - Cambridge University Press.
Rational Decision and Causality.Ellery Eells - 1982 - Cambridge University Press.
Decision Theory and the Rationality of Further Deliberation.Igor Douven - 2002 - Economics and Philosophy 18 (2):303-328.
Evidence, Decision and Causality.Arif Ahmed - 2014 - Cambridge University Press.
Biting the Bayesian Bullet: Zeckhauser's Problem.Richard Jeffrey - 1988 - Theory and Decision 25 (2):117-122.
A Unified Bayesian Decision Theory.Richard Bradley - 2007 - Theory and Decision 63 (3):233-263,.
Decision Theory and Rationality.Jos Luis Bermdez - 2009 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-09-10

Total views
1 ( #1,450,398 of 2,401,863 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #552,092 of 2,401,863 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes