Economic Rationality and Explaining Human Behavior: An Adaptationist Program?
International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences 3 (7):79-94 (2008)
Attempts to explain human behavior that appeal to economic rationality share many of the same ontological as- sumptions and methodological practices that the so-called ‘adaptationist program’ in biology was criticized for. This program in biology was largely abandoned by biologists as poorly motivated, and replaced with the active testing of both adaptive and non-adaptive hypotheses regarding the spread and maintenance of traits in populations. This development was largely welcome by the biological community, despite having required the development of new tools, both conceptual and method- ological. Many analysts of contemporary microeconomic practice criticize the assumptions and practices employed therein as similarly poorly motivated. Close attention to these criticisms reveal them to have more than superficial similarities to the critiques of adaptationism in biology. These similarities extend to some macroeconomics researchers recent suggestions of ways that hypotheses regarding the causes of people’s actions might be tested; as yet, however, these suggestions have not been embraced by the field as a whole. By attending to the ways in which biological practice has moved beyond the adaptationist program, similar changes in economic practice may be motivated
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Biological Levers and Extended Adaptationism.Gillian Barker - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 23 (1):1-25.
Towards an Evolutionary Pluralism? The Need to Establish Evidentiary Standards and Avoid Reification of Assumptions.Agustin Fuentes - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):518-519.
Human Rationality and the Unique Origin Constraint.Mohan P. Matthen - 2002 - In André Ariew (ed.), Functions. Oxford University Press. pp. 341.
The Fall and Rise of Dr. Pangloss: Adaptationism and the Spandrels Paper 20 Years Later.Massimo Pigliucci & Jonathan Kaplan - 2000 - Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15 (2):66-77.
How to Pursue the Adaptationist Program in Psychology.Russil Durrant & Brian D. Haig - 2001 - Philosophical Psychology 14 (4):357 – 380.
Adaptationism – How to Carry Out an Exaptationist Program.Paul W. Andrews, Steven W. Gangestad & Dan Matthews - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):489-504.
Popper's Metaphysical Research Program for the Human Sciences.Noretta Koertge - 1975 - Inquiry 18 (4):437 – 462.
Nice Idea, but is It Science?Richard Schuster - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):240-241.
Lifelines to a Sinking Cause.H. Dieter Steklis - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):907-909.
Rationality and Economic Behavior.Daniel R. Fusfeld - 1996 - Journal of Economic Methodology 3 (2):307-315.
The Rational Analysis of Mind and Behavior.Nick Chater & Mike Oaksford - 2000 - Synthese 122 (1-2):93-131.
Adaptationism, Culture, and the Malleability of Human Nature.Chandra Sekhar Sripada - 2008 - In Peter Caruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind, Volume 3. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads35 ( #143,338 of 2,152,269 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #399,788 of 2,152,269 )
How can I increase my downloads?