Biology and Philosophy 16 (2):189--213 (2001)

Authors
Massimo Pigliucci
CUNY Graduate Center
Abstract
We attempt to improve the understanding of the notion of agene being `for a phenotypic trait or traits. Considering theimplicit functional ascription of one thing being `for another,we submit a more restrictive version of `gene for talk.Accordingly, genes are only to be thought of as being forphenotypic traits when good evidence is available that thepresence or prevalence of the gene in a population is the resultof natural selection on that particular trait, and that theassociation between that trait and the gene in question isdemonstrably causal. It is therefore necessary to gatherstatistical, biochemical, historical, as well as ecologicalinformation before properly claiming that a gene is for aphenotypic trait. Instead of hampering practical use of the `genefor talk, our approach aims at stimulating much needed researchinto the functional ecology and comparative evolutionary biologyof gene action.
Keywords concept of the gene   gene function   philosophical debate on functions
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1006773112047
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Exaptation–A Missing Term in the Science of Form.Stephen Jay Gould & Elisabeth S. Vrba - 1982 - In David L. Hull & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Philosophy of Biology. Oxford University Press.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Dilemma of Dominance.Douglas Allchin - 2005 - Biology and Philosophy 20 (2-3):427-451.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Genes in the Postgenomic Era.Paul E. Griffiths & Karola Stotz - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (6):499-521.
Are All Genes Regulatory Genes?Rosario Michael Piro - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (4):595-602.
Genes Made Molecular.C. Kenneth Waters - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (2):163-185.
Gene Names as Proper Names of Individuals: An Assessment.Thomas A. C. Reydon - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2):409-432.
Genes: Philosophical Analyses Put to the Test.Karola Stotz & Paul Griffiths - 2004 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 26 (1):5-28.
The Elusive Concept of the Gene.Petter Portin - 2009 - Hereditas 146 (3):112-117.
Historical Development of the Concept of the Gene.Petter Portin - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (3):257 – 286.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
677 ( #9,900 of 2,455,421 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #32,674 of 2,455,421 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes