Three Prejudices Against Terrorism

Critical Studies on Terrorism 2 (2):181-199 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper criticizes three assumptions regarding terrorism and the agents who carry it out: 1) terrorists are always indiscriminate in their targeting, 2) terrorism is never effective in combating oppression, and 3) terrorists never participate in fair negotiations as they merely wish to switch places with their oppressors. By criticizing these three prejudices against terrorism, the paper does not attempt to justify or excuse terrorism generally nor in the specific case of Sri Lanka which is examined. Instead, it creates the necessary room for such justifications or excuses to be critically appraised by dismantling the popular myths surrounding terrorism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,466

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-08-13

Downloads
137 (#90,162)

6 months
1 (#417,143)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Shawn Kaplan
Adelphi University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references