Bonaventure's Commentary on Luke: Four Case Studies of his Creative Borrowing from Hugh of St. Cher

Franciscan Studies 59 (1):133-236 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1353/frc.2001.0009

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A Comparison of the Glossa Ordinaria, Hugh of St. Cher, and St. Bonaventure on Luke 8:26-39.Robert J. Karris - 2000 - Franciscan Studies 58 (1):121-236.
St. Bonaventure's Use of Distinctiones: His Independence of and Dependence on Hugh of St. Cher.Robert J. Karris - 2002 - Franciscan Studies 60 (1):209-251.
St. Bonaventure's: Interpretation of the Evangelical Life in his Commentary on the Gospel of St. John.Robert J. Karris Ofm - 2006 - Franciscan Studies 64 (1):319-335.
Nova et Vetera: Things New and Old in St. Bonaventure's Commentary on the Gospel of St. John.Robert J. Karris Ofm - 2007 - Franciscan Studies 65 (1):121-136.
Bonaventure Commentary on the Sentences [of Peter Lombard]: Prologue.Saint Bonaventure & Oleg Bychkov - 2008 - Franciscan Studies 66:75-83.
Stephen Langton and Hugh of St. Cher on the Causality of the Sacraments.Damian van den Eynde - 1951 - Franciscan Studies 11 (3-4):141-155.
Hugh of Saint-Cher's Stockholm" Gloss on the Sentences": An Abridgment rather than a First Redaction.Walter H. Principe - 1963 - Mediaeval Studies 25 (1):372-376.
Some Fontes of the Commentary of Hugh de Saint Cher: William of Auxerre, Guy d'Orchelles, Alexander of Hales.Kilian F. Lynch - 1953 - Franciscan Studies 13 (2-3):119-146.
Bonaventure’s Proof of Trinity.Christopher B. Gray - 1993 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67 (2):201-217.
Thomas Reist, O.F.M. CONV., Saint Bonaventure as a Biblical Commentator: A Translation and Analysis of His Commentary on Luke, XVIII, 34-XIX, 42. Lanham, Md., and London: University Press of America, 1985. Pp. xx, 263. $21.50 (cloth); $12.50 (paper). [REVIEW]Francis E. Kelley - 1986 - Speculum 61 (4):1032-1033.
The Gospels in the Paris Schools in the Late 12th and Early 13th Centuries: Peter the Chanter, Hugh of St. Cher, Alexander of Hales, John of la Rochelle. [REVIEW]Beryl Smalley - 1980 - Franciscan Studies 40 (1):298-369.
The Theology of the Hypostatic Union in the Early Thirteenth Century: The Doctrines of William of Auxerre, Alexander of Hales, Hugh of Saint-Cher, and Philip the Chancellor,".Walter H. Principe - 1962 - Mediaeval Studies 24:392-394.
Report of a Thesis Recently Defended at the Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies: The Theology of the Hypostatic Union in the Early Thirteenth Century: The Doctrines of William of Auxerre, Alexander of Hales, Hugh of Saint-Cher and Philip the Chancellor.Walter H. Principe - 1962 - Mediaeval Studies 24 (1):392-394.
Divine Infinity in Some Texts of Hugh of Saint Cher.Richard F. McCaslin - 1964 - Modern Schoolman 42 (1):47-69.
Bonaventure's Ideal and Hugh of St. Victor's Comprehensive Biblical Theology.Paul Rorem - 2012 - Franciscan Studies 70:385-397.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
13 (#1,010,467)

6 months
7 (#411,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references