“Chieftain” Subculture in Russia in Search of Historical Alternatives

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 62 (4):7-24 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The article examines the views of the prominent Russian politician and publicist Vasily Vitalyevich Shulgin, whom the author considers to be the largest ideologist of the “chieftain” political subculture in Russian political culture. Following Shulgin, the author distinguishes two fundamentally different models of power: “monarchical” type of power and “chieftain” type of power. V.V. Shulgin was one of the first Russian thinkers who, after Alexander Pushkin and Sergei Solovyov, considered the “golden age” of the Russian society to be under the rule of “leaders-heroes”. Shulgin explained many of the problems of Russian statehood revealed in the early 20th century by the degradation of the Russian ruling class and specifically the Romanov dynasty. Under these conditions, the national leader P.A. Stolypin, able to bring the country out of crisis by evolution, had appeared “next to the monarch,” but he has not been appreciated by Russian society and it has caused a national catastrophe. The First World War has accelerated the degradation of the Russian government. The “democratic forces” that came to power in Russia for a short time could not nominate a new “leader” from their ranks. Shulgin foresaw that “intermediate figures” like the White generals or the Red diarchy of Lenin and Trotsky would eventually give way to the autocratic rule of an all-Russian “Chief,” who would combine the ideology of the Whites and the will of the Reds.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,623

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Book Review: Chechnya: Tombstone of Russian Power. [REVIEW]Rory J. Conces - 1998/99 - International Third World Studies Journal and Review 10:81-84.
Delegitimization of “Russian world”: alternatives to nonalternativeness.Natalia Fialko - 2024 - Filosofiya osvity Philosophy of Education 29 (2):78-91.
Editor's Introduction.Taras Zakydalsky - 2002 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 41 (3):3-6.
Legal Philosophies of Russian Liberalism. [REVIEW]James P. Scanlan - 1994 - Review of Metaphysics 47 (3):642-644.


Added to PP

11 (#1,172,863)

6 months
8 (#531,034)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Aysun Kara
Istanbul University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references