Omnis Determinatio est Negatio. On Habermas, Myth, and Truth With his monumental genealogy of Western philosophy Jürgen Habermas delivers an achievement that is worthy of great praise. In carefully constructed arguments he presents in detail the close connection between, and the mutual indebtedness of, religion and philosophy as they developed in the West for more than two millennia. With regard to the current state of affairs he acknowledges that we should continue to engage with subjects such as purpose, meaningfulness, and how to behave. He proposes that where religion is withdrawing, philosophy should take its place. In spite of its great merits, there are some fundamental shortcomings in the overall image Habermas wishes to convey. By suggesting that Western religion and philosophy have been the major driving forces not only of cognitive but also of ethical progress, he underestimates the moral value of pre-Socratic and other holistic world views that radically differ from the idiosyncratic Western one. For example, he perceives Homer’s mythological thinking as nothing but a primitive state of mind against which the ethical and intellectual progress of later developments could come to the fore. This paper proposes that we should give much more weight to the difference between the ‘cognitive’ and the ‘ethical’ than Habermas does. In principle, as a form of argumentative reasoning, philosophy belongs to the domain of truth. As such, it is not a suitable successor to religion. On the other hand, provided they operate primarily within their own domain – which is the domain of meaningfulness –, religion, literature and the arts, ancient myth, friendship, love, and humour may still be best equipped to sharpen our sense of justice and help us deal with feelings of moral disorientation and fragmentation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5117/antw2021.2.004.kard
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,337
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

ST Omnis Determinatio Negatio Est? La Lecture Hégélienne de Spinoza Contestée Par P. Macherey.J. van Heemst - 1985 - Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 77 (4):222-234.
Schelling on Individuation.Daniel Whistler - 2016 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 8 (3):329-344.
Remotio – Negatio.Ysabel de Andia - 2001 - Archives d'Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 68:0-0.
The Natural Law Lecture, 2010 Torture, Suicide and Determinatio.J. Waldron - 2010 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 55 (1):1-29.
Ley natural, determinatio y derecho positivo.Sebastián Contreras Aguirre - 2011 - Veritas: Revista de Filosofía y Teología 40 (25):39-54.
H. Lio OFM: Determinatio "superflui" in doctrina Alexandri Halensis eiusque scholae. [REVIEW]C. Hubatka - 1957 - Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Theologie 4 (1):93.


Added to PP index

Total views
3 ( #1,358,478 of 2,508,057 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #276,895 of 2,508,057 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes