Oxford University Press (2006)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
George Karamanolis breaks new ground in the study of later ancient philosophy by examining the interplay of the two main schools of thought, Platonism and Aristotelianism, from the first century BC to the third century AD. Arguing against prevailing scholarly assumption, he argues that the Platonists turned to Aristotle only in order to elucidate Plato's doctrines and to reconstruct Plato's philosophy, and that they did not hesitate to criticize Aristotle when judging him to be at odds with Plato. Karamanolis offers much food for thought to ancient philosophers and classicists.
|
| Keywords | Platonists |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Reprint years | 2013 |
| Buy this book | $38.44 new (21% off) $39.05 from Amazon (20% off) Amazon page |
| Call number | B517.K37 2006 |
| ISBN(s) | 0199264562 9780199264568 9780199684632 0199684634 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
PhilArchive copy
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy Papers currently archived: 69,160
External links
(no proxy) Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
Chapters BETA
Introduction
This introductory chapter addresses the question why Aristotle’s philosophy attracted so much attention by Platonists in late antiquity. The author argues that Platonic (that is, Plato’s) philosophy was subject to different reconstructions by Platonists, who often resorted to Aristotle in ... see more
Plutarch
This chapter begins with a discussion of Plutarch’s Platonism and knowledge of Aristotle’s work. It then presents Plutarch’s most substantial discussion of how Aristotle’s philosophy compares with that of Plato. Plutarch held that Aristotle often preserves Plato’s doctrine in a more system... see more
Numenius
This chapter begins with a discussion of Numenius’ Pythagoreanism and his thesis on Aristotle’s philosophy. It then analyses the question of whether Pythagoreanism is incompatible with Aristotelianism. It is argued that Numenius does not show hostility to Aristotle, and does not even displ... see more
Atticus
This chapter contends that Atticus wrote with the aim of castigating the widespread use of Aristotle’s work by Platonists and Peripatetics, who tended to use Aristotle as a guide to Plato’s philosophy on the assumption that Aristotle preserved Plato’s doctrines and/or often also followed t... see more
Ammonius Saccas
Ammonius Saccas held the view that the philosophy of Aristotle is in agreement with that of Plato on most essential philosophical issues. It is argued that Ammonius was an independent thinker who, though a Platonist, had a weaker commitment to Plato than most of his contemporary Platonists... see more
Plotinus
This chapter examines the instances in which Plotinus compares Peripatetic and Platonic views, and attempts to sketch a preliminary answer to the question of how Plotinus saw the relationship between Platonic and Aristotelian philosophies. It is argued that Plotinus’ attitude to Aristotle’... see more
Porphyry
Porphyry was much more involved in the study of Aristotle’s work than any other Platonist before him. It is shown that Porphyry criticized Aristotle, but he also considered him to have agreed with Plato in all crucial philosophical issues in physics, psychology, ethics, and metaphysics. Po... see more
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
How Plotinus' Soul Animates His Body: The Argument for the Soul-Trace at Ennead 4.4.18.1-9.Christopher Isaac Noble - 2013 - Phronesis 58 (3):249-279.
Desire and Reason in Plato's Republic.Hendrik Lorenz - 2004 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 27:83-116.
Is the Idea of the Good Beyond Being? Plato's "Epekeina Tês Ousias" Revisited.Rafael Ferber & Gregor Damschen - 2015 - In Debra Nails, Harold Tarrant, Mika Kajava & Eero Salmenkivi (eds.), SECOND SAILING: Alternative Perspectives on Plato. Wellprint Oy. pp. 197-203.
A Horse is a Horse, of Course, of Course, but What About Horseness?Necip Fikri Alican - 2015 - In Debra Nails & Harold Tarrant (eds.), Second Sailing: Alternative Perspectives on Plato. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica. pp. 307–324.
'Making New Gods? A Reflection on the Gift of the Symposium.Mitchell Miller - 2015 - In Debra Nails, Harold Tarrant, Mika Kajava & Eero Salmenkivi (eds.), Second Sailing: Alternative Perspectives on Plato. Societas Scientiarum Fennica. pp. 285-306.
View all 34 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Platonism: Ancient and Modern.Paul Shorey - 1938 - Berkeley: Calif., University of California Press.
Plato and Aristotle in Agreement?: Platonists on Aristotle From Antiochus to Porphyry.Michael Ewbank - 2007 - Review of Metaphysics 60 (4):870-872.
Review: Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle From Antiochus to Porphyry. [REVIEW]G. R. Boys-Stones - 2007 - Mind 116 (464):1129-1132.
Review of George E. Karamanolis, Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle From Antiochus to Porphyry. [REVIEW]Lloyd P. Gerson - 2006 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (10).
Plato and Aristotle in Agreement?: Platonists on Aristotle From Antiochus to Porphyry—George E. Karamanolis.S. J. Arthur Madigan - 2007 - International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (2):243-245.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
102 ( #113,485 of 2,499,305 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,195 of 2,499,305 )
2009-01-28
Total views
102 ( #113,485 of 2,499,305 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,195 of 2,499,305 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
