Authors
Abstract
Does logic describe something or not? If not, is it a normative or practical discipline? Is there a radical division between the practical or normative level and the theoretical or descriptive level? A discipline is theoretical, we may say, if its main propositions contain descriptive expressions, such as “is” or “have”, but no normative expressions, such as “ought”, “ought not” or “may”. A discipline is normative if its main propositions are of the form “it ought to be”. Theoretical propositions express what is, whereas practical propositions express what should be. So a theoretical discipline is descriptive and a normative discipline is prescriptive, but what does a theoretical discipline describe?
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1515/agph.84.3.319
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,242
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Bolzano and the Analytical Tradition.Sandra Lapointe - 2014 - Philosophy Compass 9 (2):96-111.
Kant-Bibliographie 2002.Margit Ruffing - 2004 - Kant-Studien 95 (4):505-538.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
49 ( #206,873 of 2,419,597 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,199 of 2,419,597 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes