Nussbaum and the Capacities of Animals

Authors
T. J. Kasperbauer
Indiana University
Abstract
Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities approach emphasizes species-specific abilities in grounding our treatment of animals. Though this emphasis provides many action-guiding benefits, it also generates a number of complications. The criticism registered here is that Nussbaum unjustifiably restricts what is allowed into our concept of species norms, the most notable restrictions being placed on latent abilities and those that arise as a result of human intervention. These restrictions run the risk of producing inaccurate or misleading recommendations that fail to correspond to the true needs of animals. Here and throughout the essay the argument draws from the lives of captive apes, especially those with extensive experience with humans. A further criticism is that the normative guidance the capabilities approach does provide is merely at the level of heuristics. Preference testing, it is argued, also uses species norms profitably as a heuristic, but it does so within a much larger and fecund system of assessing an animal’s well-being
Keywords Nussbaum  Capabilities  Preference testing  Apes
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10806-012-9436-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,999
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
Commodities and Capabilities.Amartya Sen - 1999 - Oxford University Press India.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Is CRISPR an Ethical Game Changer?Marcus Schultz-Bergin - 2018 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 31 (2):219-238.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Martha Nussbaum on Animal Rights.Anders Schinkel - 2008 - Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 41-69.
Animal Liberation at 30.Peter Singer - 2012 - In Stephen Holland (ed.), Arguing About Bioethics. Routledge. pp. 185.
Animal Ethics: Toward an Ethics of Responsiveness.Kelly Oliver - 2010 - Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):267-280.
Political Animals: Luck, Love and Dignity.Martha C. Nussbaum - 1998 - Metaphilosophy 29 (4):273-287.
Killing Humans and Killing Animals.Peter Singer - 1979 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-4):145 – 156.
A Buddhist Critique of Nussbaum's Account of Compassion.Jeremiah Conway - 2001 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 8 (1):7-12.
Derrida’s Flair.Michael Naas - 2010 - Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):219-242.
Does Fish Welfare Matter? On the Moral Relevance of Agency.Frederike Kaldewaij - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):63-74.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-12-11

Total downloads
38 ( #163,553 of 2,275,165 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #59,034 of 2,275,165 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature