The Research‐Treatment Distinction: A Problematic Approach for Determining Which Activities Should Have Ethical Oversight

Hastings Center Report 43 (s1):4-15 (2013)
Authors
Tom Beauchamp
Georgetown University
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1002/hast.133
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 37,134
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What We Worry About When We Worry About the Ethics of Clinical Research.David Wendler - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (3):161-180.
Delimiting the Concept of Research: An Ethical Perspective.Lisa Bortolotti & Bert Heinrichs - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (3):157-179.
Revisiting Data Mining: 'Hunting' with or Without a License.Aris Spanos - 2000 - Journal of Economic Methodology 7 (2):231-264.
The Diverse Ethics of Translational Research.Neema Sofaer & Nir Eyal - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (8):19-30.
Do We Need a Special Ethics for Research?Sven Ove Hansson - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (1):21-29.
Revolution or Reform in Human Subjects Research Oversight.Steven Joffe - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):922-929.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-22

Total downloads
29 ( #227,911 of 2,308,399 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #215,321 of 2,308,399 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature