Wise Action: An Examination of Prudence and Morality

Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo (2003)

Authors
David Kaspar
St. John's University
Abstract
Morality is dependent upon prudence. To put the matter differently, one cannot be moral without being prudent. While this central contention of Wise Action is evident to common sense, contemporary moral theory is unable to accept it for two reasons. Morality is supposed to be the supreme normative consideration in any given situation. Moreover, since immoral actions often are guided by self-interested---and therefore prudent---reasons, prudence can't but be opposed to morality. While each of these common assumptions contains an important grain of truth, interpreting them correctly requires a thorough understanding of prudence. Wise Action explores the nature and content of prudence, and describes its relation to morality in the field of action. Problems which continue to undermine the credibility of moral theory, such as moral dilemmas and moral luck, are more properly understood as problems of prudence. Once it is given its due as a normative consideration, prudence solves these problems with ease
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,992
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-07

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes