Cogitations: A Study of the Cogito in Relation to the Philosophy of Logic and Language and a Study of Them in Relation to the Cogito

Oxford University Press (1986)
Abstract
The cogito ergo sum of Descartes is one of the best-known--and simplest--of all philosophical formulations, but ever since it was first propounded it has defied any formal accounting of its validity. How is it that so simple and important an argument has caused such difficulty and such philosophical controversy? In this pioneering work, Jerrold Katz argues that the problem with the cogito lies where it is least suspected--in a deficiency in the theory of language and logic that Cartesian scholars have brought to the study of the cogito. Katz contends that the laws of traditional logic have distorted Descartes's reasoning so that it no longer fits either Descartes's own account of the cogito in his writings or the role he assigns it in his project. Katz proposes that the cogito can be understood as an example of "analytic entailment," a concept in the philosophy of language whereby a statement can be a formally valid inference without depending on a law of logic. Developing and defending his thesis, he shows us that by grappling with an historical philosophical problem it is possible to make an original contribution to the advance of contemporary philosopy.
Keywords Analysis (Philosophy  Language and logic
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 1988
Buy the book $4.99 used (94% off)   $49.17 new (37% off)   $77.00 direct from Amazon    Amazon page
Call number B808.5.K37 1986
ISBN(s) 0195037448   0195055500   9780195055504
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,208
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
Analyticity and the Analysis Relation.Dennis Earl - 2009 - Acta Analytica 24 (2):139-148.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Cogito : From Descartes to Sartre. [REVIEW]Weimin Mo - 2007 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (2):247-264.
Doubts About Indubitability.Peter Slezak - 2010 - Philosophical Forum 41 (4):389-412.
The Crisis of the Cogito.Paul Ricoeur - 1996 - Synthese 106 (1):57 - 66.
Descartes's "Cogito" and Katz's "Cogitations".Gareth B. Matthews - 1987 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 68 (3/4):197.
The Cogito Circa Ad 2000.David Woodruff Smith - 1993 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 36 (3):225 – 254.
On Cogito Propositions.William J. Rapaport - 1976 - Philosophical Studies 29 (1):63-68.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
1 ( #1,014,250 of 2,242,633 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #410,355 of 2,242,633 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature