Cogitations: A Study of the Cogito in Relation to the Philosophy of Logic and Language and a Study of Them in Relation to the Cogito
Oxford University Press (1986)
The cogito ergo sum of Descartes is one of the best-known--and simplest--of all philosophical formulations, but ever since it was first propounded it has defied any formal accounting of its validity. How is it that so simple and important an argument has caused such difficulty and such philosophical controversy? In this pioneering work, Jerrold Katz argues that the problem with the cogito lies where it is least suspected--in a deficiency in the theory of language and logic that Cartesian scholars have brought to the study of the cogito. Katz contends that the laws of traditional logic have distorted Descartes's reasoning so that it no longer fits either Descartes's own account of the cogito in his writings or the role he assigns it in his project. Katz proposes that the cogito can be understood as an example of "analytic entailment," a concept in the philosophy of language whereby a statement can be a formally valid inference without depending on a law of logic. Developing and defending his thesis, he shows us that by grappling with an historical philosophical problem it is possible to make an original contribution to the advance of contemporary philosopy.
|Keywords||Analysis (Philosophy Language and logic|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$3.00 used (91% off) $27.50 new (16% off) $66.08 direct from Amazon (10% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B808.5.K37 1986|
|ISBN(s)||0195037448 0195055500 9780195055504|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
Similar books and articles
Cogito : From Descartes to Sartre. [REVIEW]Weimin Mo - 2007 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (2):247-264.
» Credo* Me* Cogitare Ergo Scio* Me* Esse1/2 « — Descartes' »Cogito Ergo Sum« Reinterpreted.Rainer Trapp - 1988 - Erkenntnis 28 (2):253 - 267.
Cogitations : In Language We Trust: J. J. Katz's Anatomy of the Cartesian Cogito.Bernard Roy - 2003 - Philosophical Forum 34 (3-4):439–450.
Descartes's "Cogito" and Katz's "Cogitations".Gareth B. Matthews - 1987 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 68 (3/4):197.
Doubts About Descartes' Indubitability: The Cogito as Intuition and Inference.Peter Slezak - 2010 - Philosophical Forum 41 (4):389-412.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #864,381 of 2,151,957 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,812 of 2,151,957 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.