Theory and Decision 48 (3):241-262 (2000)

This paper shows how alternative, culturally-determined motivational forces can be substituted for self-interest or rationality in the theory of choice. Several possibilities are considered, including the replacement of preference optimization by such propellants as the selection of the `second best' or the `central' option. It is argued that although all choice behavior, even that consistent with the alternatives considered, can ultimately be understood as satisfying the criterion of rationality, richer and more meaningful explanation is obtained by focusing on culturally significant alternative motivations when the latter turn out, in particular environments, to be more important than self-interest
Keywords Choice  Choice behavior  Rationality  Rationalizability  Nonrational choice behavior  Nonrationalizable choice behavior
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1005250525852
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,704
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Embedded Choices.Diego Lanzi - 2010 - Theory and Decision 68 (3):263-280.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
34 ( #286,350 of 2,340,174 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #515,720 of 2,340,174 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes