Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (4):1053-1073 (1983)
AbstractLet U be a well-founded model of ZFC whose class of ordinals has uncountable cofinality, such that U has a Σ n end extension for each n ∈ ω. It is shown in Theorem 1.1 that there is such a model which has no elementary end extension. In the process some interesting facts about topless end extensions (those with no least new ordinal) are uncovered, for example Theorem 2.1: If U is a well-founded model of ZFC, such that U has uncountable cofinality and U has a topless Σ 3 end extension, then U has a topless elementary end extension and also a well-founded elementary end extension, and contains ordinals which are (in U) highly hyperinaccessible. In § 3 related results are proved for κ-like models (κ any regular cardinal) which need not be well founded. As an application a soft proof is given of a theorem of Schmerl on the model-theoretic relation κ → λ. (The author has been informed that Silver had earlier, independently, found a similar unpublished proof of that theorem.) Also, a simpler proof is given of (a generalization of) a characterization by Keisler and Silver of the class of well-founded models which have a Σ n end extension for each n ∈ ω. The case κ = ω 1 is investigated more deeply in § 4, where the problem solved by Theorem 1.1 is considered for non-well-founded models. In Theorems 4.1 and 4.4, ω 1 -like models of ZFC are constructed which have a Σ n end extension for all n ∈ ω but have no elementary end extension. ω 1 -like models of ZFC which have no Σ 3 end extension are produced in Theorem 4.2. The proof uses a notion of satisfaction class, which is also applied in the proof of Theorem 4.6: No model of ZFC has a definable end extension which satisfies ZFC. Finally, Theorem 5.1 generalizes results of Keisler and Morley, and Hutchinson, by asserting that every model of ZFC of countable cofinality has a topless elementary end extension. This contrasts with the rest of the paper, which shows that for well-founded models of uncountable cofinality and for κ-like models with κ regular, topless end extensions are much rarer than blunt end extensions
Similar books and articles
Well- and Non-Well-Founded Fregean Extensions.Ignacio Jané & Gabriel Uzquiano - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (5):437-465.
Elementary Extensions of Countable Models of Set Theory.John E. Hutchinson - 1976 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 41 (1):139-145.
End Extensions and Numbers of Countable Models.Saharon Shelah - 1978 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 43 (3):550-562.
A Model of Peano Arithmetic with No Elementary End Extension.George Mills - 1978 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 43 (3):563-567.
Chains of End Elementary Extensions of Models of Set Theory.Andrés Villaveces - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (3):1116-1136.
On Certain Types and Models for Arithmetic.Andreas Blass - 1974 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 39 (1):151-162.
The Cofinality Spectrum of the Infinite Symmetric Group.Saharon Shelah & Simon Thomas - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (3):902-916.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Largest Initial Segments Pointwise Fixed by Automorphisms of Models of Set Theory.Ali Enayat, Matt Kaufmann & Zachiri McKenzie - 2018 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 57 (1-2):91-139.
Model Theory of the Regularity and Reflection Schemes.Ali Enayat & Shahram Mohsenipour - 2008 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 47 (5):447-464.
Incomparable Ω1 -Like Models of Set Theory.Gunter Fuchs, Victoria Gitman & Joel David Hamkins - 2017 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 63 (1-2):66-76.
References found in this work
On Κ-Like Structures Which Embed Stationary and Closed Unbounded Subsets.James H. Schmerl - 1976 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 10 (3-4):289-314.
Models with Second Order Properties II. Trees with No Undefined Branches.Saharon Shelah - 1978 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 14 (1):73.