Descartes on the objective reality of materially false ideas

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81 (4):385–408 (2000)

Dan Kaufman
University of Colorado, Boulder
“The Standard Interpretation” of Descartes on material falsity states that Descartes believed that materially false ideas (MFIs) lack “objective reality” [realitas objectiva]. The argument for the Standard Interpretation depends on a statement from the “Third Meditation” that MFIs are caused by nothing. This statement, in conjunction with a causal principle introduced by Descartes, seems to entail that MFIs lack objective reality. However, the Standard Interpretation is incorrect. First, I argue that, despite initial appearances, the manner in which Descartes understands the proposition that MFIs are caused by nothing does not entail that they lack objective reality. Secondly, I argue that Descartes is committed to the objective reality of MFIs because of his quasi-scholastic explanation of MFIs.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1468-0114.00111
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,122
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Intentionality: Some Lessons From the History of the Problem From Brentano to the Present.Dermot Moran - 2013 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21 (3):317-358.
Revelation and the Nature of Colour.Keith Allen - 2011 - Dialectica 65 (2):153-176.
Objective Being and “Ofness” in Descartes.Lionel Shapiro - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (2):378-418.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Ontological Status of Cartesian Natures.Lawrence Nolan - 1997 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2):169–194.
Descartes' Problematic Causal Principle of Ideas.Frederick J. O’Toole - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:167-191.
Descartes' Quartum Quid.Pedro Amaral - 1987 - Philosophy Research Archives 13:379-409.
Transparency and Falsity in Descartes's Theory of Ideas.Claudia Lorena Garcia - 1999 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (3):349 – 372.
Substance, Reality, and Distinctness.Boris Hennig - 2008 - Prolegomena 7 (1):2008.
Objective Reality of Ideas in Descartes, Caterus, and Suárez.Norman J. Wells - 1990 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 28 (1):33-61.
Objective Being and “Ofness” in Descartes.Lionel Shapiro - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (2):378-418.


Added to PP index

Total views
124 ( #68,442 of 2,289,284 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #238,403 of 2,289,284 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature