Fittingness and Idealization

Ethics 124 (3):572-588 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This note explores how ideal subjectivism in metanormative theory can help solve two important problems for Fitting Attitude analyses of value. The wrong-kind-of-reason problem is that there may be sufficient reason for attitude Y even if the object is not Y-able. The many-kinds-of-fittingness problem is that the same attitude can be fitting in many ways. Ideal subjectivism addresses both by maintaining that an attitude is W-ly fitting if and only if endorsed by any W-ly ideal subject. A subject is W-ly ideal when the most robust way of avoiding W-type practical problems is deferring to her endorsement

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-06-22

Downloads
1,410 (#10,304)

6 months
109 (#51,393)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Antti Kauppinen
University of Helsinki

Citations of this work

How Emotions Grasp Value.Antti Kauppinen - 2024 - Philosophical Issues 34 (1):213-233.
A Fitting-Attitude Approach to Aesthetic Value?Uriah Kriegel - 2023 - British Journal of Aesthetics 63 (1):57-73.
Meaning and Happiness.Antti Kauppinen - 2013 - Philosophical Topics 41 (1):161-185.
Ideals and Idols: On the Nature and Appropriateness of Agential Admiration.Antti Kauppinen - 2019 - In Alfred Archer & André Grahle (eds.), The Moral Psychology of Admiration. Rowman & Littlefield International.
Favoring.Antti Kauppinen - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (7):1953-1971.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Of the Standard of Taste.David Hume - 1985 - Liberty Fund. Edited by E. Miller.
The Toxin Puzzle.Gregory S. Kavka - 1983 - Analysis 43 (1):33-36.
Sentiment and value.Justin D’Arms & Daniel Jacobson - 2000 - Ethics 110 (4):722-748.

View all 8 references / Add more references