Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (2):115-140 (2002)
: This article draws upon the Roman Catholic distinction between "ordinary" and "extraordinary" means of medical treatment to analyze the case of "Jodie" and "Mary," the Maltese conjoined twins whose surgical separation was ordered by the English courts over the objection of their Roman Catholic parents and Cormac Murphy-O'Connor, the Roman Catholic Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster. It attempts to shed light on the use of that distinction by surrogate decision makers with respect to incompetent patients. In addition, it critically analyzes various components of the distinction by comparing the reasoning used by Catholic moralists in this case with the reasoning used in other cases that raise similar issues, including women facing crisis pregnancies who prefer abortion to adoption and the Indiana "Baby Doe" case
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Conflicts Between Parents and Health Professionals About a Child’s Medical Treatment: Using Clinical Ethics Records to Find Gaps in the Bioethics Literature.Rosalind McDougall, Lauren Notini & Jessica Phillips - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (3):429-436.
Similar books and articles
The Development and Nature of the Ordinary/Extraordinary Means Distinction in the Roman Catholic Tradition.Scott M. Sullivan - 2007 - Bioethics 21 (7):386–397.
One or Two: An Examination of the Recent Case of the Conjoined Twins From Malta.Y. Michael Barilan - 2003 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (1):27 – 44.
Imposed Separation of Conjoined Twins-- Moral Hubris by the English Courts?R. Gillon - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (1):3-4.
Terri Schiavo and the Roman Catholic Tradition of Forgoing Extraordinary Means of Care.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 33 (2):359-362.
Decision to Use the Respirator: Moral Policy. [REVIEW]David C. Thomasma - 1980 - Bioethics Quarterly 2 (4):229-236.
The Ordinary-Extraordinary Distinction Reconsidered: A Moral Context for the Proper Calculus of Benefits and Burdens. [REVIEW]Thomas J. Bole - 1990 - HEC Forum 2 (4):219-232.
Animalism, Dicephalus, and Borderline Cases.Stephan Blatti - 2007 - Philosophical Psychology 20 (5):595-608.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #133,974 of 2,177,979 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #317,206 of 2,177,979 )
How can I increase my downloads?