Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (2):115-140 (2002)

: This article draws upon the Roman Catholic distinction between "ordinary" and "extraordinary" means of medical treatment to analyze the case of "Jodie" and "Mary," the Maltese conjoined twins whose surgical separation was ordered by the English courts over the objection of their Roman Catholic parents and Cormac Murphy-O'Connor, the Roman Catholic Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster. It attempts to shed light on the use of that distinction by surrogate decision makers with respect to incompetent patients. In addition, it critically analyzes various components of the distinction by comparing the reasoning used by Catholic moralists in this case with the reasoning used in other cases that raise similar issues, including women facing crisis pregnancies who prefer abortion to adoption and the Indiana "Baby Doe" case
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/ken.2002.0011
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,496
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

“Jodie” and “Mary”: Separating the Maltese Twins.William E. May - 2001 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 1 (3):407-416.
Conjoined Twins of Malta: A Survey of Catholic Opinion.Mark S. Latkovic & Timothy A. Nelson - 2001 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 1 (4):585-614.
Selective Nontreatment of Handicapped Newborns.Robert Weir - 1989 - Journal of Religious Ethics 17 (1):187-188.
To Treat or Not to Treat.Richard C. Sparks - forthcoming - Bioethics and the Handi.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
73 ( #145,653 of 2,446,312 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #456,608 of 2,446,312 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes