In Volker Schmitz (ed.), Axel Honneth and the Critical Theory of Recognition. Springer Verlag. pp. 41-68 (2019)

In his Reification. A New Look at an Old Idea, Axel Honneth attempts to positively draw on Lukács’s theory of reification and to reinterpret it in the frame of the theory of recognition he has been developing since the beginning of the 1990s. As the content of the book is very rich, in this chapter I confine myself to dealing with two main questions: firstly, whether Honneth’s interpretation of Lukács is plausible and, secondly, to what extend Lukács’s critical theory can be helpful in pointing out the limits of Honneth’s theory of reification itself. In order to answer the first question, I examine Honneth’s critique of what he calls Lukács’s “official version” of the theory of reification, which he connects with the idealist philosophy of identity. Then I turn to Honneth’s interpretation of the “unofficial version” of Lukács’s concept of reification which he reconstructs in recognition-theoretical terms as the “forgetfulness of recognition.” Finally, I proceed to answer the above question by deploying Lukács’s theory to summarize some of the dispersed critiques of Honneth’s theory of reification that have been formulated in the relevant bibliography. From a Lukácsian point of view Honneth’s anthropological conceptualization of reification itself appears as reified.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-91980-5_3
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,784
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What is Reification? A Critique of Axel Honneth.Timo Jütten - 2010 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (3):235-256.
What is Reification? A Critique of Axel Honneth.Timo Jütten - 2010 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (3):235-256.
Axel Honneth, Reification, and "Nature".Marco Angella - 2019 - Radical Philosophy Review 22 (1):1-30.
Heidegger, Reification and Formal Indication.Nythamar de Oliveira - 2012 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 4 (1):35-52.
Recovering Georg Lukács.Daniel Lopez - 2015 - Historical Materialism 23 (1):265-289.


Added to PP index

Total views
1 ( #1,516,870 of 2,463,118 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,363 of 2,463,118 )

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes