Philosophical Studies 146 (2):179-96 (2009)
I argue that recent virtue theories (including those of Hursthouse, Slote, and Swanton) face important initial difficulties in accommodating the supererogatory. In particular, I consider several potential characterizations of the supererogatory modeled upon these familiar virtue theories (and their accounts of rightness) and argue that they fail to provide an adequate account of supererogation. In the second half of the paper I sketch an alternative virtue-based characterization of supererogation, one that is grounded in the attitudes of virtuous ideal observers, and that avoids the concerns raised in the first part of the paper.
|Keywords||virtue ethics virtue theory virtue ideal observer Hursthouse supererogation supererogatory ideals right action|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Saints and Heroes.J. O. Urmson - 1958 - In A. I. Melden (ed.), Essays in Moral Philosophy. University of Washington Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Intimacy, Admirability, and Virtue: An Examination of Michael Slote's View.Munir Talukder - 2010 - Human Affairs 20 (1).
Similar books and articles
The Epistemic Demands of Environmental Virtue.Jason Kawall - 2010 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (1-2):109-28.
Supererogation for Utilitarianism.Jean-Paul Vessel - 2010 - American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):299 - 319.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads541 ( #2,454 of 2,032,467 )
Recent downloads (6 months)54 ( #5,023 of 2,032,467 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.