Buridan’s Ass

Dialogue and Universalism 15 (3-4):137-146 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper discusses Buridan’s Ass as a thought experiment that has been misunderstood. First, the thought experiment is presented in its traditional form and typical objections to it are discussed. Then the author argues that William of Ockham supplies the background necessary for a more meaningful formulation. Buridan’s Ass is designed to show that each individual must choose how to value the value we discover in the world and that, in so doing, we create individual preferences.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,733

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Solution for Buridan’s Ass.Eugene Chislenko - 2016 - Ethics 126 (2):283-310.
Buridan's Ass.Stephen Makin - 1986 - Ratio (Misc.) 28 (2):132.
The Beliefs and Intentions of Buridan's Ass.Nathaniel Sharadin & Finnur Dellsén - 2017 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 3 (2):209-226.
The Non‐Rationality of Buridan's Ass.Roger A. Shiner - 1973 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 11 (4):329-335.
Buridan's Ass: A Paradox Redux.Adebowale Oriku - 2008 - Philosophy Now 65:53-54.
Buridan’s Ass and Other Dilemmas.Wesley Cooper & Guillermo Barron - 2000 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 7 (2-3):21-31.
Buridan’s Ass and Reducible Intentions.Joe Mintoff - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Research 26:207-221.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-15

Downloads
36 (#621,186)

6 months
3 (#1,467,943)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sharon Kaye
John Carroll University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references