Logica Universalis 4 (2):225-239 (2010)
Reasoning is a goal-oriented activity. The logical steps are at best the median part of a full reasoning: before them, a language has to be defined, and a model of the goal in this language has to be developed; after them, their result has to be checked in the real world with respect to the goal. Both the prior and the subsequent steps can be conducted rationally; none of them has a logical counterpart. Furthermore, Logic aims at prescribing what a correct reasoning is. But correct with respect to what? If the answer is: with respect to truth, the next question is whether the truth in everyday life, physics, economy, is the same as the truth that logicians have in mind. Resorting to Logic is justified only if an idealization in terms of true propositions in the logical sense is compatible with the goal. If such an idealization is legitimate, so is the use of classical Logic. If not, there is no authority forbidding to skew Logic in order to better reflect the nature of the reasoning required for the task
|Keywords||Everyday life reasoning rationality natural language nonmonotonic logic|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
On the Reasoning of Real-World Agents: Toward a Semantics for Active Logic.Michael L. Anderson, John Grant & Don Perlis - unknown
Azande Logic Versus Western Logic?Timm Triplett - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (3):361-366.
Progress Towards a Formal Theory of Practical Reasoning: Problems and Prospects.Richmond H. Thomason - unknown
Logic as Instrument: The Millian View on the Role of Logic.Ken Akiba - 1996 - History and Philosophy of Logic 17 (1-2):73-83.
Added to index2010-07-26
Total downloads35 ( #140,819 of 2,146,823 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #385,701 of 2,146,823 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.