Crossroads 3 (1):64-68 Free Online (2008)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
I briefly chart the position Einstein came to on nuclear weapons. Then I defend that position against Matchett's idea that Einstein behaved as a pop scientist and intervened ignorantly on an issue of wider concern.
|
Keywords | Einstein Nuclear Weapons |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Disarming Nuclear Apologists.Robert E. Goodin - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):153 – 176.
Einstein and Aquinas: A Rapprochement: A Rapprochement.John F. Kiley - 1970 - The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
On the Role of the Michelson–Morley Experiment: Einstein in Chicago.Jeroen van Dongen - 2009 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 63 (6).
Einstein's Jewish Science: Physics at the Intersection of Politics and Religion.Steven Gimbel - 2012 - Johns Hopkins University Press.
A Say in the End of the World: Morals and British Nuclear Weapons Policy, 1941-1987.Roger Ruston - 1989 - Clarendon Press.
Nuclear Weapons and the Ultimate Environmental Crisis.Michael Allen Fox - 1987 - Environmental Ethics 9 (2):159-179.
Did Einstein Stumble? The Debate Over General Covariance.John D. Norton - 1995 - Erkenntnis 42 (2):223 - 245.
Einstein, His Theories, and His Aesthetic Considerations.Gideon Engler - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (1):21 – 30.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2012-10-08
Total views
31 ( #368,267 of 2,505,207 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,705 of 2,505,207 )
2012-10-08
Total views
31 ( #368,267 of 2,505,207 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,705 of 2,505,207 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads