Narrative, Nanotechnology and the Accomplishment of Public Responses: a Response to Thorstensen

NanoEthics 8 (3):241-250 (2014)

Abstract
In this paper, we respond to a critique by Erik Thorstensen of the ‘Deepening Ethical Engagement and Participation in Emerging Nanotechnologies’ project concerning its ‘realist’ treatment of narrative, its restricted analytical framework and resources, its apparent confusion in focus and its unjustified contextualisation and overextension of its findings. We show that these criticisms are based on fairly serious misunderstandings of the DEEPEN project, its interdisciplinary approachand its conceptual context. Having responded to Thorstensen’s criticisms, we take the opportunity to clarify and develop our approach to narrative. We articulate the need for novel, theoretically robust approaches to the formation of public attitudes which transcend the limitations of both survey-based approaches—which remain wedded to methodological individualism and which presume that individuals hold distinct and relatively stable attitudes and preferences—and interactionist approaches to public talk, which focus too strongly on individuals-in-interaction as reasoning agents and which ignore the constitutive role of culture and discourse in the formation of public opinion. We suggest that our use of narrative can help to better understand the process through which public attitudes to emerging technology develop out of interactive an engagement with wider cultural arguments and accounts of science and technology. We finish by pointing to parallel developments in social thought—from Charles Taylor’s treatment of social imaginaries to recent developments in post-Bourdieuian cultural sociology—as related projects in understanding the cultural resources and grammars that provide the conceptual infrastructure for modern social life
Keywords Nanotechnology  Narrative  Public opinion formation  The DEEPEN project  Social imaginaries  Enlightenment  Cultural sociology
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11569-014-0209-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 49,040
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Modern Social Imaginaries.Charles Taylor - 2003 - Duke University Press.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

An Ethics of the System: Talking to Scientists About Research Integrity.Sarah Davies - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (4):1235-1253.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Understanding Public Debate on Nanotechnologies.Rene von Schomberg (ed.) - 2010 - Publications Office of the European Union.
The Laboratory Revisited.Robert Doubleday - 2007 - NanoEthics 1 (2):167-176.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-11-12

Total views
13 ( #671,599 of 2,311,171 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #350,742 of 2,311,171 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature