Science, Technology, and Human Values 45 (3):347-380 (2020)
AbstractOver the past few decades, significant advances have been made in public engagement with, and the democratization of, science and technology. Despite notable successes, such developments have often struggled to enhance public trust, avert crises of expertise and democracy, and build more socially responsive and responsible science and innovation. A central reason for this is that mainstream approaches to public engagement harbor what we call “residual realist” assumptions about participation and publics. Recent coproductionist accounts in science and technology studies offer an alternative way of seeing participation as coproduced, relational, diverse, and emergent but have been somewhat reluctant to articulate what this means in practice. In this paper, we make this move by setting out a new framework of interrelating paths and associated criteria for remaking public participation with science and democracy in more experimental, reflexive, anticipatory, and responsible ways. This framework comprises four paths to: forge reflexive participatory practices that attend to their framings, emergence, uncertainties, and effects; ecologize participation through attending to the interrelations between diverse public engagements in wider systems; catalyze practices of anticipatory reflection to bring about responsible democratic innovations; and reconstitute participation as constitutive of systems of technoscience and democracy.
Similar books and articles
Participatory Democracy, Science and Technology: An Exploration in the Philosophy of Science.Karl Rogers - 2008 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Technologies of Democracy: Experiments and Demonstrations.Brice Laurent - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):649-666.
Public Participation in the Making of Science Policy.Darrin Durant - 2010 - Perspectives on Science 18 (2):pp. 189-225.
The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement in Science: Commentary On: “Constitutional Moments in Governing Science and Technology”.Rinie van Est - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):639-648.
The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement in Science.Rinie Est - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):639-648.
Opening Up the Participation Laboratory: The Cocreation of Publics and Futures in Upstream Participation.Jose Mawyin, Helen Holmes, Nicky Gregson, Prue Chiles, Alastair Buckley, Watson Matt & Anna Krzywoszynska - 2018 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 43 (5):785-809.
Editorial Overview: Public Science and Technology Scholars: Engaging Whom?Erik Fisher - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):607-620.
Participation as Post-Fordist Politics: Demos, New Labour, and Science Policy. [REVIEW]Charles Thorpe - 2010 - Minerva 48 (4):389-411.
Mediating Science and Society in the EU and UK: From Information-Transmission to Deliberative Democracy?Anwar Tlili & Emily Dawson - 2010 - Minerva 48 (4):429-461.
Inquiry for the Public Good: Democratic Participation in Agricultural Research.Gerad Middendorf & Lawrence Busch - 1997 - Agriculture and Human Values 14 (1):45-57.
Publics in the Making: Mediating Different Methods of Engagement and the Publics These Construct: Commentary On: “Technologies of Democracy: Experiments and Demonstrations”. [REVIEW]Alison Mohr - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):667-672.
Does Controversial Science Call For Public Participation? The Case Of Gmo Skepticism.Andreas Christiansen, Karin Jonch-Clausen & Klemens Kappel - 2017 - Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 12 (1):26-50.
Assessing Project Approval Procedures as Formalised Forms of Public Participation.Michael Zschiesche - 2012 - Poiesis and Praxis 9 (1-2):145-156.
What Personal Responsibilities Facilitate the Construction of a Cultural Democracy? Involvement of the Public in the Construction of a Cultural Democracy: Improvements and Constraints.Alice Anberrée - 2012 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 23:261-272.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Democratising Measurement: Or Why Thick Concepts Call for Coproduction.Anna Alexandrova & Mark Fabian - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12 (1):1-23.
The Vera Causa of Endangered Species Legislation: Alfred Newton and the Wild Bird Preservation Acts, 1869–1894.James Hickling - 2021 - Journal of the History of Biology 54 (2):275-309.
Participation, Empowerment, and Evidence in the Current Discourse on Personalized Medicine: A Critique of “Democratizing Healthcare”.Tommaso Bruni & Phillip H. Roth - 2022 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 47 (5):1033-1056.
Private Issues in Public Spaces: Regimes of Engagement at a Citizen Conference.Juan C. Aceros & Miquel Domènech - 2021 - Minerva 59 (2):195-215.
An experiential account of a large-scale interdisciplinary data analysis of public engagement.Julian “Iñaki” Goñi, Claudio Fuentes & Maria Paz Raveau - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-13.
References found in this work
Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to the Actor-Network Theory.Bruno Latour - 2005 - Oxford, England and New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics.Ernesto Laclau (ed.) - 1985 - Verso.
States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order.Sheila Jasanoff (ed.) - 2004 - Routledge.
Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences Into Democracy.Bruno Latour - 2004 - Harvard University Press.