Crossroads 1 (2):28-36 Free Online (2007)

Authors
Gerald Keaney
University of Queensland
Abstract
The Identity of Indiscernibles seems like a good enough way to define identity. Roughly it simply says that if x and y have all and only the same properties, these will be the same object. However the principle has come under attack using a series of thought experiments employing the idea of radical symmetry. I follow the history of the debate including its theological origins to assess the contemporary arguments against the Identity of Indiscernibles. I argue that the principle is viable as a logical truth, and so can be put to work in our idea of objects.
Keywords Identity  Indiscernibles
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,247
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Identity of Indiscernibles.Max Black - 1952 - Mind 61 (242):153-164.
The Identity of Indiscernibles.Ian Hacking - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (9):249-256.
The Identity of Indiscernibles.Peter Forrest - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Two Spheres, Twenty Spheres, and the Identity of Indiscernibles.Michael Della Rocca - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):480–492.
The Identity of Indiscernibles and the Co-Location Problem.Robin Jeshion - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (2):163–176.
Identity, Individuality and Indiscernibility.Matteo Morganti - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 15:167-173.
Symmetrical Universes and the Identity of Indiscernibles.Thomas R. Foster - 1982 - Philosophy Research Archives 8:169-183.
Max Black on the Identity of Indiscernibles.Charles B. Cross - 1995 - Philosophical Quarterly 45 (180):350-360.
Why the Parts of Absolute Space Are Immobile.Nick Huggett - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):391-407.
Things, Relations and Identity.Edwin B. Allaire - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (3):260-272.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-04-24

Total views
80 ( #134,038 of 2,448,508 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,843 of 2,448,508 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes