The Pragma-Dialectics of Dispassionate Discourse: Early Nyāya Argumentation Theory

Religions 10 (12) (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Analytic philosophers have, since the pioneering work of B.K. Matilal, emphasized the contributions of Nyāya philosophers to what contemporary philosophy considers epistemology. More recently, scholarly work demonstrates the relevance of their ideas to argumentation theory, an interdisciplinary area of study drawing on epistemology as well as logic, rhetoric, and linguistics. This paper shows how early Nyāya theorizing about argumentation, from Vātsyāyana to Jayanta Bhaṭṭa, can fruitfully be juxtaposed with the pragma-dialectic approach to argumentation pioneered by Frans van Eemeren. I illustrate the implications of this analysis with a case study from Jayanta Bhaṭṭa’s satirical play, Much Ado about Religion (Āgamaḍambara).

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Question of Truth.David Botting - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (4):413-434.
The Impact of Argumentation on Artificial Intelligence.David Godden - 2006 - In F. H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser & M. A. van Rees (eds.), Considering Pragma-Dialectics: A Festschrift for Frans H. L. Erlbaum Associates. pp. 287-299.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-10-14

Downloads
91 (#132,921)

6 months
31 (#34,133)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Malcolm Keating
Yale-NUS College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations