Pragmatics Cognition 26 (1):112-134 (2019)
AbstractThe study aims to investigate how prior experience of interlocutors interacts with actual situational context in intercultural interactions when the latter is represented by a well-known frame: getting acquainted with others. It attempts to demonstrate how the cultural frame of the target language is broken up and substituted with an emergent frame that is co-constructed from elements from prior experience with the target language, the first language and the actual situational experience. Getting acquainted with others is a closed social situation, a cultural frame in which interlocutors usually have to follow a behavior pattern dictated by the requirements of the socio-cultural background in a given speech community. There is a ‘skeleton’ of these ‘getting to know you’ procedures that can be considered universal but is substantiated differently in every language. In each conversation in any language, ‘flesh’ is added to the ‘skeleton’ in a dynamic and co-constructed manner. However, there is a difference between how this happens in L1 and in intercultural interactions. While in L1 the ‘flesh’ on the skeleton is predetermined to a significant extent by requirements of core common ground in the given language, in intercultural encounters this ‘flesh building’ process in the target language is not set but is co-constructed by the interlocutors as emergent common ground relying on their prior experience with their own L1 culture, limited experience with the target culture and the assessment of the actual situational context. In this study the co-construction process, i.e. emergent common ground will be analyzed by examining the use of formulaic language and freely generated language in several discourse segments.
Similar books and articles
The Paradox of Communication: Socio-Cognitive Approach to Pragmatics.Istvan Kecskes - 2010 - Pragmatics and Society 1 (1):50-73.
Intercultural Philosophical Wayfaring: An Autobiographical Account in Conversation with a Friend.Michiko Yusa - 2018 - Journal of World Philosophies 3 (1):123-134.
The Writing Lesson: Imaginary Inscriptions in Cultural Encounters.Gabriele Schwab - 2003 - Critical Horizons 4 (1):55-73.
Intercultural Health Practices: Towards an Equal Recognition Between Indigenous Medicine and Biomedicine? A Case Study From Chile. [REVIEW]Maria Costanza Torri - 2012 - Health Care Analysis 20 (1):31-49.
Intercultural Philosophy: A Conceptual Clarification.Ram Adhar Mall - 2014 - Important notes: 1:67-84.
Dialogue as Moral Paradigm: Paths Toward Intercultural Transformation.J. Gregory Keller - 2011 - Policy Futures in Education 9:29-34.
The Situational Structure of Primate Beliefs.Tony Cheng - 2016 - Perspectives: International Postgraduate Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):50-57.
What Is the “Context” for Contextual Vocabulary Acquisition?William J. Rapaport - 2003 - Proceedings of the 4th Joint International Conference on Cognitive Science/7th Australasian Society for Cognitive Science Conference 2:547-552.
Presencia del modelo pedagógico nativo como base del currículo intercultural en instituciones de educación superior.Eva Cházaro - 2018 - Voces de la Educación 3 (5):20-30.
Constatival Logic: An Essay in the Philosophy of Logic.Rolando Gripaldo - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (1).
Following Pasolini: In Words, Photos, and Film, and His Perception of Cinema as Language.Annette Thorsen Vilslev - 2016 - Cultura 13 (2):77-82.
Ethical Communication and Intercultural Responsibility: A Philosophical Perspective.Giuliana Ferri - unknown
Proposal for a Code of Ethics for Intercultural Mediators in Healthcare.Pilar Flor Pérez & Montserrat Antonin Martin - 2014 - Ramon Llull Journal of Applied Ethics 5 (5):179-203.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience.Erving Goffman - 1979 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39 (4):601-602.
An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method.[author unknown] - 2011