Pragmatics and Society 1 (1):50-73 (2010)

Authors
Istvan Kecskes
Lajos Kossuth University of Arts and Sciences (PhD)
Abstract
Communication is not as smooth a process as current pragmatic theories depict it. In Rapaport’s words “We almost always fail […]. Yet we almost always nearly succeed: This is the paradox of communication”. This paper claims that there is a need for an approach that is able to explain this “bumpy road” by analyzing both the positive and negative features of the communicative process. The paper presents a socio-cognitive approach to pragmatics that takes into account both the societal and individual factors including cooperation and egocentrism that, as claimed here, are not antagonistic phenomena in interaction. This approach is considered an alternative to current theories of pragmatics that do not give an adequate account of what really happens in the communicative process. They consider communication an idealistic, cooperation-based, context-dependent process in which speakers are supposed to carefully construct their utterances for the hearer taking into account all contextual factors and hearers do their best to figure out the intentions of the speakers. This approach relies mainly on the positive features of communication including cooperation, rapport and politeness while almost completely ignores the untidy, trial-and-error nature of communication and the importance of prior contexts captured in the individual use of linguistic units. The overemphasis on cooperative, societal, contextual factors has led to disregard individual factors such as egocentrism and salience that are as important contributors to the communicative process as cooperation, context and rapport. The socio-cognitive approach is presented as a theoretical framework to incorporate and reconcile two seemingly antagonistic sides of the communicative process and explain the dynamic interplay of prior and actual situational contexts.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1075/ps.1.1.04kec
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,247
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Assessing Relevance.Fabrizio Macagno - 2018 - Lingua 210:42-64.
Explicatures Are NOT Cancellable.Alessandro Capone - 2013 - In Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo & Marco Carapezza (eds.), Perspectives on linguistic pragmatics. Springer. pp. 131-151.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Socio-Cultural Concept of Face in Akan Communication.Kofi Agyekum - 2004 - Pragmatics and Cognition 12 (1):71-92.
The Liar Paradox and Metaphysics.Matti Eklund - 2006 - In Jurgis Skilters & Matti Eklund (eds.), The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication. University of Latvia Press.
La Traduction des Sciences de la Communication En Chine : Le Concept de « Chuanboxue ».Mylène Hardy & Hailong Liu - 2010 - Hermès: La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 56 (1):129.
A Cognitive Neuroscience, Dual-Systems Approach to the Sorites Paradox.Leib Litman & Mark Zelcer - 2013 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 25 (3):355-366.
Gricean Charity: The Gricean Turn in Psychology.Carole J. Lee - 2006 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (2):193-218.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-19

Total views
19 ( #560,358 of 2,448,591 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,192 of 2,448,591 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes