Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):544-545 (2000)

Abstract
Arbib et al.'s comprehensive review of neural organization, over-relies on modernist concepts and restricts our understanding of brain and behavior. Reliance on terms like coding, transformation, and representation perpetuates a “black-box approach” to the study of the brain. Recognition is due to the authors for attempting to introduce postmodern concepts such as chaos and self-organization to the study of neural organization. However, confusion occurs in the implementation of “biologically rooted” schema theory in which schemas are viewed as computer programs. The inclusion of an additional functional level between structure and dynamics is unnecessary in a postmodernist perspective of brain and behavior.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X00353365
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,060
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

From Reductionism to Reductionism.Fred L. Bookstein - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):534-534.
Multiple Personalities and Views of Neural Organization.Rolf Kötter - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):545-546.
Analyzing the Brain.Peter Gouras - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):540-541.
Organizing the Brain's Diversities.Michael A. Arbib & Peter Érdi - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):551-565.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
15 ( #644,177 of 2,403,697 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #360,211 of 2,403,697 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes