On a medieval solution to the liar paradox

History and Philosophy of Logic 8 (2):121-140 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I examine a solution to the Liar paradox found in the work of Ockham, Burley, and Pseudo-Sherwood. I reject the accounts of this solution offered by modern commentators. I argue that this medieval line suggests a non-hierarchical solution to the Liar, according to which ?true? is analysed as an indexical term, and paradox is avoided by minimal restrictions on tokens of ?true?. In certain respects, this solution resembles the recent approaches of Charles Parsons and Tyler Burge; in other respects, it is related to a suggestion of Gödel. But, as a whole, it suggests an original solution to the Liar paradox, quite unlike any current proposals

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,621

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
40 (#343,027)

6 months
7 (#172,983)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Keith Simmons
University of Connecticut

Citations of this work

A theory of truth based on a medieval solution to the liar paradox.Richard L. Epstein - 1992 - History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (2):149-177.
True friendship and the logic of lying.Sharon M. Kaye - 2005 - Journal of Value Inquiry 39 (3-4):475-485.
A New–old Characterisation of Logical Knowledge.Ivor Grattan-Guinness - 2012 - History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (3):245 - 290.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references