Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):644-645 (1998)
Van Gelder presents the distinction between dynamical systems and digital computers as the core issue of current developments in cognitive science. We think this distinction is much less important than a reassessment of cognition as a neurally, bodily, and environmentally embedded process. Embedded cognition lines up naturally with dynamical models, but it would also stand if combined with classic computation.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Cognitive Dynamics: A Psychological Perspective.Richard A. Heath - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):642-642.
Computers and Computation in Cognitive Science.Tim van Gelder - 1998 - In T.M. Michalewicz (ed.), Advances in Computational Life Sciences Vol.2: Humans to Proteins. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing.
An Appeal for Liberalism, or Why Van Gelder's Notion of a Dynamical System is Too Narrow for Cognitive Science.Michael Wheeler - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):653-654.
Defending the Dynamic Hypothesis.Tim van Gelder - 1999 - In Wolfgang Tschacher & J-P Dauwalder (eds.), Dynamics, Synergetics, Autonomous Agents: Nonlinear Systems Approaches to Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Science. Singapore: World Scientific.
Disentangling Dynamics, Computation, and Cognition.Tim van Gelder - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):654-661.
What Might Dynamical Intentionality Be, If Not Computation?Ronald L. Chrisley - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):634-635.
Digital Computers Versus Dynamical Systems: A Conflation of Distinctions.Gerard O’Brien - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):648-649.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #334,638 of 2,171,974 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,556 of 2,171,974 )
How can I increase my downloads?