Philosophical Psychology 26 (4):502-519 (2013)
The Sphex story is an anecdote about a female digger wasp that at first sight seems to act quite intelligently, but subsequently is shown to be a mere automaton that can be made to repeat herself endlessly. Dennett and Hofstadter made this story well known and widely influential within the cognitive sciences, where it is regularly used as evidence that insect behavior is highly rigid. The present paper discusses the origin and subsequent empirical investigation of the repetition reported in the Sphex story. The repetition was first observed by Henri Fabre in 1879, and the last empirical study I found was published in 1985. In contrast to the story's clear message, the actual results have always been equivocal: the endless repetition is not standard. In addition, this repetition itself has become a minor aside in the literature on digger wasps when put in the perspective of many other examples of adaptiveness and flexibility. Nevertheless, the story and its message have to this day persevered within the cognitive sciences. For some reason, the counterevidence has been neglected time and again. The paper closes by presenting two different but compatible hypotheses that could explain why humans keep repeating this particular anecdote
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting.Daniel C. Dennett - 1984 - MIT Press.
Varieties of Meaning: The 2002 Jean Nicod Lectures.Ruth G. Millikan - 2004 - MIT Press.
Perceptual Causality and Animacy.Brian J. Scholl & Patrice D. Tremoulet - 2000 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (8):299-309.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Story Identity and Story Type.Aaron Smuts - 2009 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 67 (1):5-14.
The Technology of the Novel: Writing and Narrative in British Fiction.Tony E. Jackson - 2009 - Johns Hopkins UP.
Ritual, Routine and Regime: Repetition in Early Modern British and European Cultures.Lorna Clymer (ed.) - 2006 - Published by the University of Toronto Press in Association with the Ucla Center for Seventeenth-and Eighteenth-Century Studies and the William Andrews Clark Memorial Library.
Book Review: The Story Behind Dunbar's Story. [REVIEW]P. Munz - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (1):126-134.
The Value(s) of a Story: Theories, Models and Cognitive Values.Isabelle Peschard - 2007 - Principia 11 (2):151-169.
Story Planning: Creativity Through Exploration, Retrieval, and Analogical Transformation. [REVIEW]Mark Riedl - 2010 - Minds and Machines 20 (4):589-614.
Why Conscious Free Will Both is and Isn't an Illusion.Max Velmans - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):677.
A Commentary on 'Informed Consent to Septoplasty: An Anecdote From the Field'.Edmund Erde - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (1):18 – 27.
What Do We See in Film?Robert Hopkins - 2008 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (2):149–159.
“The Story Says That” Operator in Story Semantics.Charles B. Daniels - 1987 - Studia Logica 46 (1):73-86.
“The Whole Story”: On Narrative Philosophy and Religious Morals.Louis A. Ruprecht - 2010 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 2 (2):157-177.
Added to index2012-05-26
Total downloads37 ( #139,238 of 2,170,021 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,514 of 2,170,021 )
How can I increase my downloads?