The Sphex story: How the cognitive sciences kept repeating an old and questionable anecdote

Philosophical Psychology 26 (4):502-519 (2013)
The Sphex story is an anecdote about a female digger wasp that at first sight seems to act quite intelligently, but subsequently is shown to be a mere automaton that can be made to repeat herself endlessly. Dennett and Hofstadter made this story well known and widely influential within the cognitive sciences, where it is regularly used as evidence that insect behavior is highly rigid. The present paper discusses the origin and subsequent empirical investigation of the repetition reported in the Sphex story. The repetition was first observed by Henri Fabre in 1879, and the last empirical study I found was published in 1985. In contrast to the story's clear message, the actual results have always been equivocal: the endless repetition is not standard. In addition, this repetition itself has become a minor aside in the literature on digger wasps when put in the perspective of many other examples of adaptiveness and flexibility. Nevertheless, the story and its message have to this day persevered within the cognitive sciences. For some reason, the counterevidence has been neglected time and again. The paper closes by presenting two different but compatible hypotheses that could explain why humans keep repeating this particular anecdote
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09515089.2012.690177
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,678
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Brainstorms.Daniel C. Dennett - 1978 - MIT Press.
Perceptual Causality and Animacy.Brian J. Scholl & Patrice D. Tremoulet - 2000 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (8):299-309.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Story Identity and Story Type.Aaron Smuts - 2009 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 67 (1):5-14.
Ritual, Routine and Regime: Repetition in Early Modern British and European Cultures.Lorna Clymer (ed.) - 2006 - Published by the University of Toronto Press in Association with the Ucla Center for Seventeenth-and Eighteenth-Century Studies and the William Andrews Clark Memorial Library.
A Never-Ending Story.Ben Blumson - 2014 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 14 (40):111-120.
Book Review: The Story Behind Dunbar's Story. [REVIEW]P. Munz - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (1):126-134.
The Inconceivability of Zombies.Robert Kirk - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 139 (1):73-89.
Stories, Exemplars, and Freedom.Keith Lehrer - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (1):1-17.
Why Conscious Free Will Both is and Isn't an Illusion.Max Velmans - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):677.
A Commentary on 'Informed Consent to Septoplasty: An Anecdote From the Field'.Edmund Erde - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (1):18 – 27.
What Do We See in Film?Robert Hopkins - 2008 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (2):149–159.
“The Whole Story”: On Narrative Philosophy and Religious Morals.Louis A. Ruprecht - 2010 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 2 (2):157-177.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

37 ( #139,238 of 2,170,021 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #345,514 of 2,170,021 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums