Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (2):88-108 (2006)
According to the conservative view defended in this paper, justice holds when people have what they deserve and do not have what they do not deserve. Some of the questions considered are: how to tell what people deserve, why people should get what they deserve, how mistakes in the distribution of good and bad things can be corrected, why all egalitarian theories of justice are fundamentally mistaken, what makes the conservative view of justice practical, and what implications the conservative view has for taxation and prosperity. Familiar objections to the conservative view of justice are also considered and shown to be readily answerable.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A1 is Not a Conservative Extension of S4 but of S.Michiro Kondo - 1989 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 18 (3):321 - 323.
Desert and Equality.Richard J. Arneson - 2007 - In Nils Holtug & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (eds.), Egalitarianism: New Essays on the Nature and Value of Equality. Clarendon Press. pp. 262--293.
Global Justice and Norms of Co-Operation: The 'Layers of Justice' View.Jonathan Wolff - 2009 - In Stephen De Wijze, Matthew H. Kramer & Ian Carter (eds.), Hillel Steiner and the Anatomy of Justice: Themes and Challenges. Routledge. pp. 16--34.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads78 ( #65,088 of 2,152,224 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #162,767 of 2,152,224 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.