Faith and Philosophy 12 (1):54-78 (1995)

Authors
Jim Keller
Brock University
Abstract
Those who believe that miracles (temporary suspensions of some law of nature accomplished by divine power) have occurred typically hold that they are rare and that only a small percentage of all people have been eyewitnesses to them or been direct beneficiaries of them. Although a claim that they occur far more frequently would be empirically highly implausible, I argue that the claim that God performs miracles in such a pattern unavoidably implies that God is guilty of unfairness. I articulate a criterion of fairness, discuss various types of miracles, and defend my conclusion against a variety of possible rejoinders
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0739-7046
DOI 10.5840/faithphil199512119
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,481
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Miracles, Evidence, and God.Robert Larmer - 2003 - Dialogue 42 (1):107-.
Miracles.Michael Levine - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Miracles, Evidence, and God.Robert Larmer - 2003 - Dialogue 42 (1):107-122.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-12-01

Total views
102 ( #104,579 of 2,446,302 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #184,877 of 2,446,302 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes