Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (4):530-554 (2017)
AbstractCurrently, many scientific fields such as psychology or biomedicine face a methodological crisis concerning the reproducibility, replicability, and validity of their research. In neuroimaging, similar methodological concerns have taken hold of the field, and researchers are working frantically toward finding solutions for the methodological problems specific to neuroimaging. This article examines some ethical and legal implications of this methodological crisis in neuroimaging. With respect to ethical challenges, the article discusses the impact of flawed methods in neuroimaging research in cognitive and clinical neuroscience, particularly with respect to faulty brain-based models of human cognition, behavior, and personality. Specifically examined is whether such faulty models, when they are applied to neurological or psychiatric diseases, could put patients at risk, and whether this places special obligations on researchers using neuroimaging. In the legal domain, the actual use of neuroimaging as evidence in United States courtrooms is surveyed, followed by an examination of ways that the methodological problems may create challenges for the criminal justice system. Finally, the article reviews and promotes some promising ideas and initiatives from within the neuroimaging community for addressing the methodological problems.
Similar books and articles
Diagnosing Consciousness: Neuroimaging, Law, and the Vegetative State.Carl E. Fisher & Paul S. Appelbaum - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):374-385.
Severe Tests in Neuroimaging: What We Can Learn and How We Can Learn It.Emrah Aktunc - 2014 - Philosophy of Science 81 (5):961-973.
Dementia in Prison: Ethical and Legal Implications.S. Fazel - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):156-159.
Hart's Methodological Positivism: Stephen R. Perry.Stephen R. Perry - 1998 - Legal Theory 4 (4):427-467.
Public Relations Autonomy, Legal Dominance, and Strategic Orientation as Predictors of Crisis Communicative Strategies.Yi-Hui Huang & Shih-Hsin Su - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 86 (1):29-41.
Gene Maps, Brain Scans, and Psychiatric Nosology.Jason Scott Robert - 2007 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (2):209-218.
Concepts of Care in Organizational Crisis Prevention.Sheldene Simola - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 62 (4):341-353.
Ethical Questions in Functional Neuroimaging and Cognitive Enhancement.Danielle C. Turner & Barbara J. Sahakian - 2006 - Poiesis and Praxis 4 (2):81-94.
Placebo in the Investigation of Psychotropic Drugs, Especially Antidepressants.Stanisław Pużyński - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):135-142.
Neuroimaging Techniques for Memory Detection: Scientific, Ethical, and Legal Issues.Johanna C. van Hooff - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (1):25 – 26.
Neurotechnology and Direct Brain Communication: New Insights and Responsibilities Concerning Speechless but Communicative Subjects.Michele Farisco & Kathinka Evers (eds.) - 2016 - Routledge.
The Promise of Legal Semiotics.Sophie Cacciaguidi-Fahy & Annabelle Mooney - 2009 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 22 (4):381-386.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Big Brain Data: On the Responsible Use of Brain Data from Clinical and Consumer-Directed Neurotechnological Devices.Philipp Kellmeyer - 2018 - Neuroethics 14 (1):83-98.
Narrative Devices: Neurotechnologies, Information, and Self-Constitution.Emily Postan - 2020 - Neuroethics 14 (2):231-251.
References found in this work
Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness.David Chalmers - 1995 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 (3):200-19.
Seeing is Believing: The Effect of Brain Images on Judgments of Scientific Reasoning.David P. McCabe & Alan D. Castel - 2008 - Cognition 107 (1):343-352.
A Dark History: Memories of Lobotomy in the New Era of Psychosurgery. [REVIEW]Jenell Johnson - 2009 - Medicine Studies 1 (4):367-378.