PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:413 - 423 (1988)
| Abstract |
Formal learning theory is an approach to the study of inductive inference that has been developed by computer scientists. In this paper, I discuss the relevance of formal learning theory to such standard topics in the philosophy of science as underdetermination, realism, scientific progress, methodology, bounded rationality, the problem of induction, the logic of discovery, the theory of knowledge, the philosophy of artificial intelligence, and the philosophy of psychology.
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
PhilArchive copy
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy Papers currently archived: 56,016
External links
(no proxy) Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Learning Theory and the Philosophy of Science.Kevin T. Kelly, Oliver Schulte & Cory Juhl - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (2):245-267.
Editors' Introduction: Why Formal Learning Theory Matters for Cognitive Science.Sean Fulop & Nick Chater - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (1):3-12.
Logically Reliable Inductive Inference.Oliver Schulte - 2007 - In Michele Friend, Norma B. Goethe & Valentina Harizanov (eds.), Induction, algorithmic learning theory, and philosophy. Springer. pp. 157-178.
What If the Principle of Induction Is Normative? Formal Learning Theory and Hume’s Problem.Daniel Steel & S. Kedzie Hall - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):171-185.
Agency and Interaction What We Are and What We Do in Formal Epistemology.Jeffrey Helzner & Vincent Hendricks - 2010 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 27 (2).
Mind Changes and Testability: How Formal and Statistical Learning Theory Converge in the New Riddle of Induction.Daniel Steel - manuscript
No Answer to Hume.Colin Howson - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (3):279 - 284.
Testability and Ockham’s Razor: How Formal and Statistical Learning Theory Converge in the New Riddle of Induction. [REVIEW]Daniel Steel - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (5):471 - 489.
The New Enlightenment Hypothesis: All Learners Are Rational.Rita Nolan - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):219-220.
Finite Identification From the Viewpoint of Epistemic Update.Cédric Dégremont & Nina Gierasimczuk - 2011 - Information And Computation 209 (3):383-396.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2011-05-29
Total views
35 ( #290,176 of 2,403,593 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #551,240 of 2,403,593 )
2011-05-29
Total views
35 ( #290,176 of 2,403,593 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #551,240 of 2,403,593 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
