Globalization, Terrorism, and Democracy: 9/11 and its Aftermath

Abstract

Globalization has been one of the most hotly contested phenomena of the past two decades. It has been a primary attractor of books, articles, and heated debate, just as postmodernism was the most fashionable and debated topic of the 1980s. A wide and diverse range of social theorists have argued that today's world is organized by accelerating globalization, which is strengthening the dominance of a world capitalist economic system, supplanting the primacy of the nation-state by transnational corporations and organizations, and eroding local cultures and traditions through a global culture. Contemporary theorists from a wide range of political and theoretical positions are converging on the position that globalization is a distinguishing trend of the present moment, but there are hot debates concerning its nature, effects, and future.2 Moreover, advocates of a postmodern break in history argue that developments in transnational capitalism are producing a new global historical configuration of post- Fordism, or postmodernism as an emergent cultural logic of capitalism (Harvey 1989; Soja 1989; Jameson 1991; and Gottdiener 1995). Others define the emergent global economy and culture as a "network society" grounded in new communications and information technology (Castells 1996, 1997, and 1998). For its defenders, globalization marks the triumph of capitalism and its market economy (see apologists such as Fukuyama 1992 and Friedman 1999 who perceive this process as positive), while its critics portray globalization as negative (see, for example, Mander and Goldsmith 1996; Eisenstein 1998; and Robins and Webster 1999). Some theorists see the emergence of a new transnational ruling elite and the universalization of consumerism (Sklair 2001), while others stress global fragmentation of “the clash of civilizations” (Huntington 1996). Driving “post” discourses into novel realms of theory and politics, Hardt and Negri (2000) present the emergence of “Empire” as producing evolving forms of sovereignty, economy, culture, and political struggle that unleash an unforeseeable and unpredictable flow of novelties, surprises, and upheavals. Discourses of globalization initially were polarized into pro or con celebrations or attacks..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The globalization of human rights.Leslie Sklair - 2009 - Journal of Global Ethics 5 (2):81-96.
Liberal Democracy Vs. Neo-Liberal Globalization.Mislav Kukoc - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:399-406.
Rethink Contemporary Anti-globalization.Shifa Zhao - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:913-921.
Multiculturalism, Globalization and Postmodernism.Emilia Guliciuc - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 30:11-16.
Macrohistory and Globalization.Leonid Grinin - 2012 - Volgograd: Uchitel Publishing House. Edited by I. V. Ilʹin.
Is Globalization a Real Threat to Democracy?Andrzej Maciej Kaniowski - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 12:235-246.
Does Globalization Threaten Democracy?Pavo Barišić - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50 (2):21-25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
151 (#121,840)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?